NGC-8591 - Routine preventive services for children and ad...
Guideline:Routine preventive services for children and adolescents (ages 2 - 21). Measure Summary
NOTE: This guideline summary content is published by the National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC), in cooperation with the guideline authoring organization(s). For additional guideline resources, visit www.NGC.gov. Neither NGC or the original guideline authoring organization(s) approve of or endorse any product or service offered on this website. These NGC guideline summaries reside in the public domain and are displayed by GuidelineCentral.com as a convenient reference service for our customers visiting this website.
|
Guideline Title
Routine preventive services for children and adolescents (ages 2 - 21).
Bibliographic Source(s)
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline. This guideline updates a previous version: Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Routine preventive services for children and adolescents (ages 2-21). Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2009 May. 1 p. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope
Disease/Condition(s)
Preventable diseases or conditions such as:
Guideline Category
Counseling
Prevention
Risk Assessment
Screening
Clinical Specialty
Family Practice
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pediatrics
Preventive Medicine
Intended Users
Advanced Practice Nurses
Health Plans
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)
Target Population
Children and adolescents ages 2 to 21 years
Interventions and Practices Considered
Major Outcomes Considered
Not stated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Methodology
Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
The Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) health care analyst conducts a search of current literature in support of the guideline topic. Computer database searches are used to identify published studies, existing protocols and/or national guidelines on the selected topic developed by organizations such as the American Diabetes Association, American Heart Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, etc. If available, clinical practice guidelines from participating MQIC health plans and Michigan health systems are also used to develop a framework for the new guideline.
Number of Source Documents
Not stated
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
Levels of Evidence for the Most Significant Recommendations
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Not stated
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Using information obtained from literature searches and available health plan guidelines on the designated topic, the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) health care analyst prepares a draft guideline to be reviewed by the Medical Directors' committee at one of their scheduled meetings. Priority is given to recommendations with [A] and [B] levels of evidence (see "Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence" field). The initial draft guideline is reviewed, evaluated, and revised by the committee, resulting in draft two of the guideline. Additionally, the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians participates in guideline development at the onset of the process and throughout the guideline development procedure. The MQIC guideline feedback form and draft two of the guideline are distributed to the Medical Directors, as well as the MQIC measurement and implementation group members, for review and comments. Feedback from members is collected by the MQIC health care analyst and prepared for review by the Medical Directors' committee at their next scheduled meeting. The review, evaluation, and revision process with several iterations of the guideline may be repeated over several meetings before consensus is reached on a final draft guideline.
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
Not applicable
Cost Analysis
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
Method of Guideline Validation
External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
When consensus is reached on the final draft guideline, the Medical Directors approve the guideline for external distribution to practitioners with review and comments requested via the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) health plans (health care analyst distributes final draft to Medical Directors' committee, measurement and implementation groups to solicit feedback). The MQIC health care analyst also forwards the approved guideline draft to appropriate state medical specialty societies and physicians with expertise in the related field for their input. After all feedback is received from external reviews, it is presented for discussion at the next scheduled committee meeting. Based on feedback, subsequent guideline review, evaluation, and revision may be required prior to final guideline approval. The MQIC Medical Directors approved this guideline in May 2011. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recommendations
Major Recommendations
The level of evidence grades (A-D) are provided for the most significant recommendations and are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field. The following guideline provides recommendations for routine preventive services for children and adolescents ages 2-21 years. Children at increased risk may warrant additional services, e.g. Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program (EPSDT)1.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus 1Early Periodic Screening Diagnosis and Treatment: age specific exam and anticipatory guidance template (http://ihcs.msu.edu/quality/early_periodic_screening.php 2Family history, eating/sleeping habits, adequate fluoridation, and home oral care may provide possible/potential/visible abnormalities and a visit to the dentist for early evaluation may be recommended. 3AAP Policy Statement-Child Passenger Safety (http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/4/788.full Immunizations
Abbreviations: DTaP, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis; IPV, inactivated poliovirus vaccine; MCV4, meningococcal conjugate vaccine; MMR, measles, mumps, rubella; MMRV, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella; Tdap, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine *U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved human papillomavirus vaccine for males 9-26 years to reduce their likelihood of genital warts. Definitions: Levels of Evidence for the Most Significant Recommendations
Clinical Algorithm(s)
None provided |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
The type of evidence is provided for the most significant recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field). This guideline is based on several sources, including: Preventive Services for Children and Adolescents, Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, 2010 (www.icsi.org |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations
Potential Benefits
Through a collaborative approach to developing and implementing common clinical practice guidelines and performance measures for routine preventive services for children and adolescents ages 2 to 21, Michigan health plans will achieve consistent delivery of evidence-based services and better health outcomes. This approach also will augment the practice environment for physicians by reducing the administrative burdens imposed by compliance with diverse health plan guidelines and associated requirements.
Potential Harms
Not stated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Statements
Qualifying Statements
This guideline lists core management steps. Individual patient considerations and advances in medical science may supersede or modify these recommendations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implementation of the Guideline
Description of Implementation Strategy
Approved Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) guidelines are disseminated through email, U.S. mail, and websites. The MQIC health care analyst prepares approved guidelines for distribution. Portable Document Format (PDF) versions of the guidelines are used for distribution. The MQIC health care analyst distributes approved guidelines to MQIC membership via email. The MQIC health care analyst submits request to website vendor to post approved guidelines to MQIC website (www.mqic.org The MQIC health care analyst completes an annual statewide postcard mailing to physicians in all areas of medicine including primary care and specialties. The postcard provides the complete list of MQIC guidelines and includes which guidelines have been recently revised, which are coming up for revision, and any new published guidelines. The statewide mailing list is derived from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) provider database. Approximately 95% of the state's M.D.'s and 96% of the state's D.O.'s are included in the database. The MQIC health care analyst submits request to the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) to post approved guidelines to NGC website (www.guideline.gov
Implementation Tools
Tool Kits
For information about availability, see the Availability of Companion Documents and Patient Resources fields below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories
IOM Care Need
Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identifying Information and Availability
Bibliographic Source(s)
Adaptation
This guideline is based on several sources, including: Preventive Services for Children and Adolescents, Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, 2010 (www.icsi.org
Date Released
2007 May (revised 2011 May)
Guideline Developer(s)
Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium - Professional Association
Source(s) of Funding
Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
Guideline Committee
Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Medical Directors' Committee
Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline
Physician representatives from the 13 participating Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium health plans, Michigan State Medical Society, Michigan Osteopathic Association, Michigan Association of Health Plans, Michigan Department of Community Health, Michigan Peer Review Organization, and the University of Michigan Health System
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
Standard disclosure is requested from all individuals participating in the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) guideline development process, including those parties who are solicited for guideline feedback (e.g., health plans, medical specialty societies). Additionally, members of the MQIC Medical Directors' Committee are asked to disclose all commercial relationships as well.
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline. This guideline updates a previous version: Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Routine preventive services for children and adolescents (ages 2-21). Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2009 May. 1 p.
Guideline Availability
Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Web site
Availability of Companion Documents
The following is available:
Patient Resources
None available
NGC Status
This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on March 5, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on March 12, 2008. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on November 6, 2009. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on December 10, 2009. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on November 12, 2010 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Afluria (influenza virus vaccine). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on August 25, 2011. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on September 2, 2011.
Copyright Statement
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which may be reproduced with the citation developed by the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site. All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities. Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx. NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes. Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





