Guideline:
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM clinical protocol #13: contraception during breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med 2006 Spring;1(1):43-51. [18 references] PubMed
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Category
Counseling
Evaluation
Management
Prevention
Risk Assessment
Intended Users
Advanced Practice Nurses
Allied Health Personnel
Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)
To outline the contraceptive methods available for use during breastfeeding and to provide additional background on the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) and its use
Target Population
Breastfeeding mothers
Interventions and Practices Considered
- Assessment of criteria for the period of lowest pregnancy risk
- Prenatal assessment of mother's choice for postpartum contraception
- Assessment of likelihood of success with lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) as a method of family planning
- Patient education on the correct use of LAM as a method of family planning
- Discussion of alternative methods of contraception
- Natural family planning
- Barriers
- Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
- Progestin-only methods
- Estrogen-containing contraceptives
- Discussion of optimal child spacing
Major Outcomes Considered
- Incidence of unwanted pregnancy
- Effect of hormonal contraception on lactation breast feeding
Methods Used to Collect/Select Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods used to Collect/Select the Evidence
An initial search of relevant published articles written in English in the past 20 years in the fields of medicine psychiatry psychology and basic biological science is undertaken for a particular topic. Once the articles are gathered the papers are evaluated for scientific accuracy and significance.
Number of Source Documents
Not stated
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Expert Consensus (Committee)
Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
Levels of Evidence
I Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized controlled trial
II-1 Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization
II-2 Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies preferably from more than one center or research group
II-3 Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of the introduction of penicillin treatment in the 1940s) could also be regarded as this type of evidence.
III Opinions of respected authorities based on clinical experience descriptive studies and case reports; or reports of expert committees
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review of Published Meta-Analyses
Systematic Review with Evidence Tables
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
An expert panel is identified and appointed to develop a draft protocol using evidence based methodology. An annotated bibliography (literature review) including salient gaps in the literature are submitted by the expert panel to the Protocol Committee.
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Not stated
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
Not applicable
Cost Analysis
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
Method of Guideline Validation
External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
Draft protocol is peer reviewed by individuals outside of lead author/expert panel including specific review for international applicability. Protocol Committee's sub-group of international experts recommends appropriate international reviewers. Chair (co-chairs) institutes and facilitates process. Reviews submitted to committee Chair (co-chairs).
Draft protocol is submitted to The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (ABM) Board for review and approval. Comments for revision will be accepted for three weeks following submission. Chair (co-chairs) and protocol author(s) amends protocol as needed.
Following all revisions protocol has final review by original author(s) to make final suggestions and ascertain whether to maintain lead authorship.
Final protocol is submitted to the Board of Directors of ABM for approval.
Major Recommendations
General Principles
Table. Principles for Consideration in Contraception During Lactation
| When helping a breastfeeding mother choose a method of family planning consider her: | In regards to: |
|---|---|
| 1. Breastfeeding patterns status and plans | Issues concerning lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) and hormonal methods |
| 2. Child's age | Issues concerning LAM hormonal methods intrauterine device (IUD) insertion and barrier sizing |
| 3. Age | Issues concerning hormonal methods |
| 4. Previous contraceptive experience | Social and use issues as well as sensitivities |
| 5. Husband's (partner's) opinions on various methods | Social and use issues |
| 6. Childbearing plans | Spacing versus limiting methods |
| 7. Health status | Spacing versus limiting methods and hormonal methods |
| 8. Accessibility of family planning methods health care personnel and socio-economic status | Local access availability issues and affordability issues |
Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) of Postpartum Contraception
Method: What is LAM?
The Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) is presented as an algorithm (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document) and includes three criteria for defining the period of lowest pregnancy risk. Furthermore it advises the immediate commencement of other methods if any one of the three criteria is not met. Clinically the mother is asked:
- Have you had a menstrual bleed?
- Are you giving any supplementary foods or fluids in addition to breastfeeding?
- Is your infant older than six months of age?
If she answers negatively to all three criteria she meets the requirements for LAM efficacy. She should be advised to initiate another form of contraception if any of the above three questions are answered affirmatively to achieve adequate efficacy for birth spacing or fertility limitation. If the mother is interested in and qualifies for LAM she is advised to ask herself the same three questions in an ongoing manner. It is advisable to ensure that she has her next method on hand and initiates its use whenever her answer to any of the three questions changes. She should be advised to contact her health care professional immediately if she has any questions as to whether or not the method still applies.
Definitions for LAM Use
To use LAM correctly it is important that the patient understand each of the three criteria. Menses return for the purposes of LAM use is defined as any bleeding that occurs after 56 days postpartum that is perceived by the patient as a menses or any two consecutive days of bleeding. Full or nearly full breastfeeding is shown in Figure 2 in the original guideline document and includes exclusive nearly exclusive and some irregularly provided supplements as long as they do not disrupt the frequency of feeds. This method of family planning is now used in more than 30 countries and has been included in the family planning and Maternal and Child Health policy in several countries. It has been widely accepted as a natural family planning method that demands no abstinence. It is used as an introductory method for the postpartum period or for the woman who hesitates to use a commodity-based method. It has the added benefit of encouraging optimal breastfeeding behavior providing synergistic support for primary health of the mother and the child.
Considerations for Physician Counseling and Method Use
Postpartum contraception like breastfeeding should be discussed with patients during prenatal visits. The contraceptive choice a woman makes with or without her partner's input depends on factors such as previous experience with contraceptives future childbearing plans husband or partner's attitude and her lactation status. If a patient is not comfortable with a method she may use it ineffectively or not at all even if she does not wish to become pregnant.
There are several common reasons why a woman may choose LAM: she may prefer a period of time without taking medicine or using any devices she may prefer more time for selection of a long-term or permanent method or she may wish to try something based on her natural physiology.
Frequent nursing and milk expression alters the hypothalamic pulsatility of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) production which in turn mediates follicle stimulating and luteinizing hormones so that effective ovulation is less likely to occur. Several milk expression studies confirmed that the hormonal response is not identical to breastfeeding so if the milk expression is a regular occurrence some of the physiological responses may be modified. This is not directly mediated by prolactin. A patient who has had a spontaneous or induced abortion prior to 20 weeks usually will have spontaneous ovulation that results in the secretory portion of the menstrual cycle leading to menses. The patient will usually ovulate before any vaginal bleeding. If she delivers at term and is fully breastfeeding however vaginal bleeding (once the 6 weeks of lochia has stopped) nearly always occurs prior to first adequate ovulation during the first 6 months. Once regular feeding begins there is an increase in fertile first cycles. Ovulation in the non-lactating woman may occur as early as 3 weeks postpartum.
LAM Management Issues
There are several suggested behaviors that would contribute to method success and duration.
- LAM is not meant for patients who are giving regular supplemental feedings.
- Women can use LAM while working if they pump their breasts and provide milk to the baby's caregiver during their absence. However in one study using this approach the efficacy was about 95% slightly lower but not significantly different than efficacy in women not separated from their infants. Further research is needed on this issue; however if this is the only method a woman is willing to accept and is well informed of the possibility of decreased efficacy LAM should remain an option for women who are regularly separated from their infants.
- One set of studies found that exclusively breastfeeding women using LAM are more likely to be amenorrheic at 6 months than exclusively breastfeeding controls (84% vs. 69.7% respectively). Women who use LAM actively have a higher feeding frequency and hence shorter inter-feeding intervals than other exclusive breastfeeders (see Figure 4 in the original guideline document). However even with short inter-feeding intervals some women experience earlier menses return. While we do not know whether these cycles are adequate for conception no other sign of imminent fertility return are evident. Therefore whether or not breastfeeding continues to be frequent another method must be used for birth spacing when menses return.
- Three studies have indicated that the efficacy of LAM can be maintained during the 6 to 12 month period provided the mother who originally followed this method continues to breastfeed before giving complementary foods at less than 4 hours intervals during the day and 6 hours intervals at night while remaining amenorrheic.
Transition to Other Methods
When LAM no longer applies or whenever a breastfeeding woman wishes to use an alternate family planning method not all other methods have equal consequences for breastfeeding success. Therefore alternative methods are presented ranked by increasing potential impact on breastfeeding success (see Table below). While not equally efficacious the first choice methods are those that do not interfere with lactation. While studies show no major problems when progestin-only methods are introduced the weight of anecdotal evidence as well as the possible postpartum impact of progestins on prolactin merits the second choice rating. Estrogen containing pills are known to reduce milk quantity. Optimal child spacing for maternal recovery the support of lactation duration and for child growth development and survival may be influenced by particular demographics. A minimum of 18 months between births is recommended under all circumstances and at least three years or longer is recommended in developing countries.
| Table. Family Planning During Lactation: Minimizing Physiologic Impact on Breastfeeding |
|---|
|
Issues In Counseling Selection of Contraceptives During Breastfeeding
Advantages and Disadvantages
The issues to be considered in counseling a pregnant or postpartum woman concerning contraceptive choice for use during breastfeeding extend beyond issues of efficacy. She will also wish to ensure that the selected method is appropriate for breastfeeding expectations (as listed in "General Principles" above) in addition to the considerations for the non-lactating woman. The Table 3 in the original guideline document titled "Use of Contraceptive Methods During Lactation: Advantages Disadvantages and Impact on Lactation" provides useful information for counseling the lactating mother and is not generally considered in contraception handbooks.
Clinical Algorithm(s)
A clinical algorithm for the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) is provided in the original guideline document.
Type of Evidence supporting the Recommendations
The type of evidence supporting the recommendations is not specifically stated.
The recommendations were based primarily on a comprehensive review of the existing literature. In cases where the literature does not appear conclusive recommendations were based on the consensus opinion of the group of experts.
Potential Benefits
- Appropriate use of contraception during breastfeeding
- Lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) has the added benefit of encouraging optimal breastfeeding behavior providing synergistic support for primary health of the mother.
Potential Harms
Side effects associated with contraceptive use (see Table 3 in the original guideline document for disadvantages and side effects associated with various methods)
Contraindications
Copper intrauterine devices are contraindicated with Wilson's disease or copper allergy.
Qualifying Statements
A central goal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine is the development of clinical protocols for managing common medical problems that may impact breastfeeding success. These protocols serve only as guidelines for the care of breastfeeding mothers and infants and do not delineate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as standards of medical care. Variations in treatment may be appropriate according to the needs of an individual patient.
Description of Implementation Strategy
An implementation strategy was not provided.
Implementation Tools
Clinical Algorithm
For information about availability see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.
IOM Care Need
Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM clinical protocol #13: contraception during breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med 2006 Spring;1(1):43-51. [18 references] PubMed
Adaptation
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
Source(s) of Funding
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine
A grant from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau US Department of Health and Human Services
Guideline Committee
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee
Composition of Group that Authored the Guideline
Committee Members: Caroline J. Chantry MD Co-Chairperson; Cynthia R. Howard MD MPH Co-Chairperson; Ruth A. Lawrence MD FABM; Nancy G. Powers MD FABM
Contributors: *Miriam H. Habbok MD MPH Department of Maternal and Child Health School of Public Health University of North Carolina; *Victoria Nichols-Johnson MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medicine Southern Illinois University; *Veronica Valdes-Anderson MD Department of Pediatrics San Joaquin Medical Center Pontifical Catholic University of Chile
*Lead Authors
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
None to report
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Availability
Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Web site.
Print copies: Available from the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine 140 Huguenot Street 3rd floor New Rochelle New York 10801.
Availability of Companion Documents
The following is available:
- Procedure for protocol development and approval. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. 2007 Mar. 2 p.
Print copies: Available from the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine 140 Huguenot Street 3rd floor New Rochelle New York 10801.
Patient Resources
None available
NGC STATUS
This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on November 14 2007. The information was verified by the guideline developer on October 31 2008.
COPYRIGHT STATEMENT
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.
Single copies may be downloaded for personal use. Copyright permission to be requested for use of multiple copies by e-mailing requests to abm@bfmed.org. An official request form will be sent electronically to person requesting multiple copy use.
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop produce approve or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies relevant professional associations public or private organizations other government agencies health care organizations or plans and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .
NGC AHRQ and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC AHRQ or its contractor ECRI Institute and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.
Tools
No Quick Reference tools have been developed.

