Bibliographic Source(s)

• Finnish Medical Society Duodecim. Deep vein thrombosis. In: EBM Guidelines. Evidence-Based Medicine [Internet]. Helsinki Finland: Wiley Interscience. John Wiley & Sons; 2006 Apr 27 [Various].

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Finnish Medical Society Duodecim. Deep venous thrombosis. In: EBM Guidelines. Evidence-Based Medicine [CD-ROM]. Helsinki Finland: Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd.; 2006 Mar 15 [Various].

Guideline Category

Diagnosis
Evaluation
Management
Prevention
Risk Assessment
Treatment

Intended Users

Health Care Providers
Physicians

Guideline Objective(s)

Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines collects summarizes and updates the core clinical knowledge essential in general practice. The guidelines also describe the scientific evidence underlying the given recommendations.

Target Population

Patients with deep vein thrombosis and those at risk for thromboembolism

Interventions and Practices Considered

Evaluation/Risk Assessment/Diagnosis

1. Risk factor assessment
2. Clinical assessment of signs and symptoms (pain tenderness oedema Homan's sign swelling erythema skin warmth)
3. Doppler ultrasound (compression ultrasonography)
4. Venography
5. Measurement of plasma D-dimer by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
6. Scoring the probability of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) using signs and symptoms

Treatment/Management/Prevention

1. Choosing site of treatment (hospital versus home)
2. Mobilization
3. Fibrinolytic therapy (systemic or local) such as tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)
4. Unfractionated heparin
5. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) such as dalteparin enoxaparin
6. Warfarin
7. Thrombectomy
8. Compression bandaging/stockings
9. Vitamin K antagonists
10. Follow-up for complications (e.g. treatment of heparin-induced bleeding complications with deficient blood products [fresh frozen plasma thrombocytes] or protamine)

Major Outcomes Considered

• Incidence of complications and cost-effectiveness of treatment (home versus hospital treatment)
• Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic assessments
• Treatment effect on:
  • Incidence of pulmonary embolism
  • Incidence of major bleeding
  • Frequency of postthrombotic changes
  • Recurrence of venous thromboembolism
  • Overall mortality
  • Adverse effects

Methods Used to Collect/Select Evidence

Hand-searches of Published Literature (Primary Sources)
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)
Searches of Electronic Databases

Description of Methods used to Collect/Select the Evidence

The evidence reviewed was collected from the Cochrane database of systematic reviews and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). In addition the Cochrane Library and medical journals were searched specifically for original publications.

Number of Source Documents

Not stated

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Levels of Evidence

1. Strong research-based evidence. Multiple relevant high-quality scientific studies with homogenic results.
2. Moderate research-based evidence. At least one relevant high-quality study or multiple adequate studies.
3. Limited research-based evidence. At least one adequate scientific study.
4. No research-based evidence. Expert panel evaluation of other information.

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Review of Published Meta-Analyses
Systematic Review

Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Not stated

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

Not stated

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Not applicable

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation

Peer Review

Description of Method of Guideline Validation

Not stated

Major Recommendations

The levels of evidence [A-D] supporting the recommendations are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Aims

• To prevent pulmonary embolism (see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Pulmonary embolism [PE]") and post-thrombotic syndrome
• To suspect thrombosis in high risk patients and to carry out prophylaxis
• Plasma D-dimer test can be used in primary care as the first-line rule-out test when the probability of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is low or moderate. If DVT is clinically apparent the patient should however be referred for diagnostic imaging investigations.
• A suspected DVT is verified by venography or compression ultrasonography.
• To prevent DVT in immobilised patients: calf muscle exercises compression stockings and if necessary prophylactic treatment with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).
• When the diagnosis has been confirmed DVT can be treated at home or in a general hospital ward. A distal deep calf thrombosis does not cause emboli and only about 25% of the thrombi reach the femoral level.
• Idiopathic venous thrombosis may be a sign of a malignancy or thrombophilia (see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Thrombophilia [inherited]").

Risk Factors for Deep Venous Thrombosis

• Immobilisation due to an acute illness especially if the circulation is simultaneously impaired (e.g. heart failure paralysis obesity surgery infection long flight)
• Trauma to the lower limbs (fractures in plaster cast in particular); even a plaster boot in a risk patient
• Hereditary or acquired coagulation disorder (see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Leg oedema") (always suspect these aetiologies when no external cause is evident)
• Polycythaemia essential thrombocytosis
• Use of oral contraceptives hormone replacement therapy particularly in smokers
• Previous venous thrombosis especially if there was no predisposing factor
• Pregnancy and the postpartum period (6 weeks) caesarean section the age of the mother
• Cancer in an active phase
• Central venous catheters often located in an upper limb
• The aetiological factor of deep venous thrombosis in an upper limb is often mechanical strain or narrowing of the vessel; no thrombophilia

Symptoms

• Oedema of the entire leg or calf (for differential diagnosis see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Leg oedema")
• Tenderness or ache at rest
• Pain in the calf while walking
• Concurrent pain tenderness and oedema are strongly suggestive of DVT (59%). Each sign alone indicates thrombosis in only 11 to 22% of the cases (Wells et al. 1997).
• Often completely asymptomatic particularly in bed bound patients in whom the first symptom may be pulmonary embolism. In patients with a hip fracture the thrombosis often only occurs in the femoral and pelvic areas.
• Almost half of proximal DVTs are associated with either symptomatic or asymptomatic pulmonary embolism.

Diagnosis

• The probability of a patient having DVT is influenced by his/her predisposition to thrombotic events and whether there is a history of previous venous thrombosis. Assess the cumulation of risks.
• Clinical findings:
  • Oedema of the ankle and lower leg; in iliac vein thrombosis oedema of the entire leg
  • Deep calf tenderness on palpation along the involved vein
  • Positive Homans' sign (not always especially if the patient is in bed rest)
  • Warmth of the skin when compared with the other leg and prominent superficial collateral veins
• Doppler ultrasound examination (see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Doppler stethoscopy in diagnostics") to assist diagnosis especially for bedfast patients who may have oedema as the only symptom:
  • Impaired or slowed flow in the popliteal vein when the calf is compressed
  • Slowed flow in the posterior tibial vein when the compression is released
  • In iliac vein thrombosis there is an absence of phasic respiratory signals or a weakened flow sound from the femoral vein when listened to at the groin.
• For differential diagnosis see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Leg oedema."

Diagnostic Strategy in Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis

• The probability of venous thrombosis can be estimated and scored using the below list of signs and conditions (Give 1 point for each finding or condition which is likely to increase the pretest probability of DVT. If a diagnosis other than DVT is highly likely for other reasons subtract 2 points from the final sum.) (Wells et al. 1997)
  • Cancer that is being actively treated or that has metastasised
  • Paralysis or recent immobilization of a lower limb
  • Bed rest of more than 3 days' duration
  • A major operation within 1 month
  • Local tenderness in the calf or in the thigh around the deep venous trunk. Often indicated as the reason for referral but when presents alone has poor prognostic value for DVT.
  • More than a 3-cm difference in the circumference of the calves
  • Strong familial predisposition (at least 2 first-degree relatives with a history of venous thrombosis)
  • You may give one additional point for the use of oral contraceptives and two points for an episode of deep venous thromboembolism in the patient's history even if these risk factors were not specifically considered in the studies assessing the value of risk scoring.
• Plasma D-dimer test is used as an exclusion test when the probability of DVT is low. The test is very sensitive but not as specific. A positive result does not therefore always indicate thrombosis. D-dimer is not a useful examination if the patient has an increased C-reactive protein (CRP) as a sign of severe infection or tissue damage.
  • If the D-dimer test is negative in a low-risk patient (0 risk points) no further investigations are needed (Kearon et al. 2001). In clinical practice a negative D-dimer test is also sufficient to exclude DVT in patients who only score one point for palpation tenderness in the calf or thigh.
  • If the first ultrasonographic result and plasma D-dimer test are both normal in a patient at a higher risk repeated ultrasonography is not necessary.
  • D-dimer concentration may also be increased during normal pregnancy.
  • Up to 90% of the elderly patients in a hospital may have increased D-dimer concentration as a consequence of different infections and tissue damages.
• Initial treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can often be started on the basis of suspicion alone. Any delay in imaging investigations will thus not pose extra risk for the patient.
• Compression ultrasonography is used currently as an early phase investigation (see picture 1 in the original guideline document).  It is sensitive (90%) particularly in proximal thrombosis but less so (50%) in distal thrombosis. Compression ultrasonography is replacing venography which is useful in the diagnosis of recurrent DVTs.
  • An abnormal ultrasonography finding is an indication for treatment. A normal result in a low-risk patient (0 risk points) excludes venous thrombosis. A normal result with a positive D-dimer in a moderate-risk patient (1 to 2 risk points) warrants a repeat ultrasonography in 7 days and in a high-risk patient (3 or more risk points) venography should be performed immediately.
  • An abnormal venography (a persistent intravenous filling deficit in at least two projections) is an indication for treatment. A normal result excludes venous thrombosis.

Treatment

Basic Rules

• Compression bandaging (see below)
• In proximal thrombosis early mobilisation is recommended after a few days of heparin therapy.
• Distal and often also proximal thrombosis can be treated at a general hospital ward or at home either by a district nurse or the patient him/herself. Based on individual situations the treating physician will decide where the treatment should be carried out.
  • Obese patients will need two injections because of the large doses needed.
  • A patient with multiple illnesses is not usually suitable for home care.
  • A patient with renal insufficiency should preferably not be treated at home because of the cumulation of drugs resulting in increased risk of bleeding.
  • The patient will need written instructions for home care.
• Hospital treatment is indicated if there is
  • Severe oedema of the entire leg
  • Thrombosis above the groin
  • Other coexisting illnesses requiring hospital treatment.
• If the treatment is carried out at home ensure that
  • The injection technique and drug doses are correct
  • The follow-up of anticoagulation therapy is adequate
  • The patient has instructions regarding compression bandages and stockings
  • The patient is monitored for possible complications (bleeding emboli).

Treatment According to the Location and Duration of the Thrombosis

• A high ileofemoral thrombus with onset within the last 7 days
  • Local fibrinolysis is implemented by introducing a catheter into the thrombus mass. The success of fibrinolysis is monitored by venography. The currently used agent for fibrinolysis is tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Treatment time is 1 to 3 days and the aim is to minimize the time because of the risk of bleeding (Mewissen et al. 1999).
    • Systemic fibrinolytic therapy similar to the one given in myocardial infarction is used in some centres. It appears to offer advantages by reducing post-thrombotic syndrome and maintaining venous patency (Watson & Armon 2004) [B].
  • The contraindications are the same as for fibrinolytic therapy in myocardial infarction (see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Thrombolytic therapy and balloon angioplasty in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]"). The aim is to decrease the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. The use is limited to young patients with recent extensive ileofemoral thrombosis or pulmonary emboli with potentially hazardous haemodynamic consequences. Total lysis is rarely achieved because venous thrombi are often old and organised.
  • LMWH (van der Belt et al. 2004; Leizorovicz et al. 1994; Leizorovicz 1996; Martineau & Tawil 1998; Hirsh et al. 1995; Gould et al. 1999;) [A] has replaced intravenous (i.v.) heparin. Begin warfarin therapy concomitantly. Heparin may be stopped when International Normalized Ratio (INR) has been within the target range (usually 2.0 to 3.0) for at least 2 days ("Guidelines on diagnosis and management" 2000).
    • Unfractionated heparin is a good treatment option for patients with a bleeding tendency and who have renal insufficiency or who have problems with thrombosis (e.g. a large thrombus in the last phase of pregnancy).
  • Thrombectomy may be indicated if the viability of the leg is threatened or when the aim is to reduce the severity of post-thrombotic syndrome (Plate et al. 1997).
• Distal thrombosis in a leg or any other thrombosis with onset more than 7 days ago
  • LMWH (e.g. dalteparin 200 IU/kg once daily enoxaparin 1.5 mg/kg once daily or 1 mg/kg twice daily) is at least as effective as standard heparin (van der Belt et al. 2004; Leizorovicz et al. 1994; Leizorovicz 1996; Martineau & Tawil 1998; Hirsh et al. 1995; Gould et al. 1999) [A].
    • In patients with increased tendency for thrombosis the twice daily regimen is recommended. (Fitzmaurice et al. 2004; Couturaud Julian & Kearon 2001) [D].
    • Heparin may be stopped when INR has been within the target range for at least 2 days. The treatment does not necessitate laboratory follow-up provided that haemostasis is stable.
    • In pregnant women and in patients with renal insufficiency thrombophilia or haemophilia the concentration of active heparin must be monitored.
  • Also LMWH may cause thrombocytopenia (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [HIT]) and paradoxical embolism even though this is rare (in 0.2% to 0.3%).
    • It is important to monitor the thrombocyte count. Actions are required if the thrombocyte count falls below 50% from the baseline value if the thrombocytopenia is progressing or if the antithrombotic treatment proves ineffective.
    • Classical days for the condition to emerge are the fifth and the tenth day from the beginning of the treatment.
    • The risk applies mainly to hospitalized patients on full treatment dose (typically associated with cardiac bypass surgery renal dialysis extensive orthopaedic surgery). However this condition should be remembered also (e.g. in an outpatient coming for rehabilitation in primary care after endoprosthetic surgery).
  • Start warfarin therapy concomitantly with heparin (see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Oral anticoagulation therapy" for instructions) and continue it according to the Table below.
  • Bandage the leg from the foot up to the upper thigh. The patient can start to walk when the leg has been bandaged.
  • Only about 25% of untreated distal thrombi progress to above the knee. Heparin-warfarin therapy is however implemented if there are no contraindications (Ginsberg 1996). Distal thrombosis may often receive no anticoagulant treatment; it may remain subclinical or occur whilst the leg is immobilized within a plaster.
• Warfarin may be ineffective if DVT is caused by cancer.
  • In patients with cancer LMWH alone is used for 6 months after the thrombotic event (Geerts et al 2004). After that the treatment may be continued either with warfarin or with LMWH if the cancer treatment is still going on.
• For the duration of warfarin therapy see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Oral anticoagulation therapy" and the Table below.
• Prevention of deep venous thrombosis see the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim guideline: "Prevention of venous thrombosis."

Table. Duration of anticoagulant therapy is determined individually with the anticipated success of therapy; the patient's other illnesses and age as well as the risk of recurrence being the decisive factors.

Treatment of Heparin-induced Bleeding

• If heparin induced severe bleeding occurs the missing blood products must be replaced (fresh frozen plasma thrombocytes). Protamine is administered if unfractionated heparin had been used. Protamine is not as effective in counteracting the action of LMWH.
• In 1% of the patients heparin causes thrombocytopenia (HIT) which is a prothrombotic condition.

Prognosis

• The risk of recurrence depends primarily on the underlying cause and its possible elimination. The duration of anticoagulation therapy is determined by the severity of the thrombosis and the risk of its recurrence. In idiopathic thrombosis the risk of recurrence is high and the treatment time is often long sometimes even lifelong. Recurrence during well-implemented therapy may suggest malignancy or phospholipid antibody syndrome.
• The condition of the venous valves is the decisive factor when assessing the risk for post-thrombotic syndrome. Anticoagulation therapy prevents the recurrence of the thrombus but does not offer protection for the valves. On the other hand a recurrence increases the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome manyfold (Prandoni et al. 1996).
• The extent and particularly high location (above the groin) of a thrombus have been considered as risk factors for post-thrombotic syndrome and in these cases fibrinolytic therapy is aimed at protecting the valves. This may be achieved by local fibrinolytic therapy administered by catheterisation (Mewissen et al. 1999). However this therapy is not readily available and may lead to complications and each case must be assessed individually.
• An elastic compression stocking reduces the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome and should always be worn (Brandjes et al. 1997) (Kolbach et al. 2003) [A].
  • The leg is bandaged using an elastic bandage starting from the foot with greater pressure near the ankle and reduced pressure higher up. The bandage is worn for two weeks day and night and is changed at 2 to 3 day intervals. After this a compression stocking is fitted. It reduces the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome by approximately 50%. The knee-length stocking is usually used. Compression class 2 is the most commonly used. The stocking is worn from 6 months to 2 years sometimes permanently.

Related Evidence

• Long-term anticoagulant therapy after first episode of venous thromboembolism reduces the risk of recurrence without significantly increasing the incidence of bleeding events (Pinede et al. 2000) [A].
• Conventional-intensity warfarin therapy appears to be more effective than low-intensity warfarin therapy for the long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. The low-intensity warfarin regimen does not reduce the risk of clinically important bleeding (Ridker et al. 2003; Kearon et al. 2003) [B].
• Treatment of vitamin K antagonists reduces the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism as long as it is used. However the absolute risk of recurrence declines over time while the risk of major bleeding remains (Hutton & Prins 2006) [A].
• Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are equally effective and safer than vitamin K antagonists in the long-term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (but they are much more costly and need subcutaneous administration) (van der Heijden et al. 2001) [B].
• The number of adverse events with LMWH during pregnancy is small but there are no randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing LMWH with unfractionated heparin (Ensom & Stephenson 1999) [C].
• The incidence of clinically overt venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery patients with negative venography at discharge and no further pharmacological prophylaxis is less than 2% (Ricotta et al. 1996) [B].
• The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method is more sensitive than latex test for D-dimer in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) (Becker et al. 1996) [C].
• Once daily treatment with LMWH in venous thromboembolism appears to be as effective and safe as twice daily treatment but the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism might be higher with the once daily regimen (van Dongen et al. 2005) [A].

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

1. Strong research-based evidence. Multiple relevant high-quality scientific studies with homogenic results.
2. Moderate research-based evidence. At least one relevant high-quality study or multiple adequate studies.
3. Limited research-based evidence. At least one adequate scientific study.
4. No research-based evidence. Expert panel evaluation of other information.

Clinical Algorithm(s)

None provided

References Supporting the Recommendations

• Becker DM Philbrick JT Bachhuber TL Humphries JE. D-dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism. A shortcut to accurate diagnosis. Arch Intern Med 1996 May 13;156(9):939-46. [46 references] PubMed



• Brandjes DP Buller HR Heijboer H Huisman MV de Rijk M Jagt H ten Cate JW. Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1997 Mar 15;349(9054):759-62. PubMed



• Couturaud F Julian JA Kearon C. Low molecular weight heparin administered once versus twice daily in patients with venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2001 Oct;86(4):980-4. PubMed



• Ensom MH Stephenson MD. Low-molecular-weight heparins in pregnancy. Pharmacotherapy 1999 Sep;19(9):1013-25. [59 references] PubMed



• Fitzmaurice D Hobbs FD McManus R. What are the effects of treatments for proximal deep vein thrombosis. Clin Evid 2004;12:297.



• Geerts WH Pineo GF Heit JA Bergqvist D Lassen MR Colwell CW Ray JG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):338S-400S. [794 references] PubMed



• Ginsberg JS. Management of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1996 Dec 12;335(24):1816-28. [106 references] PubMed



• Gould MK Dembitzer AD Doyle RL Hastie TJ Garber AM. Low-molecular-weight heparins compared with unfractionated heparin for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 1999 May 18;130(10):800-9. PubMed



• Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2000 Aug;21(16):1301-36. [373 references] PubMed



• Hirsh J Siragusa S Cosmi B Ginsberg JS. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1995 Jul;74(1):360-3. PubMed



• Hutton BA Prins MH. Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(2):CD001367.



• Kearon C Ginsberg JS Douketis J Crowther M Brill-Edwards P Weitz JI Hirsh J. Management of suspected deep venous thrombosis in outpatients by using clinical assessment and D-dimer testing. Ann Intern Med 2001 Jul 17;135(2):108-11. PubMed



• Kearon C Ginsberg JS Kovacs MJ Anderson DR Wells P Julian JA MacKinnon B Weitz JI Crowther MA Dolan S Turpie AG Geerts W Solymoss S van Nguyen P Demers C Kahn SR Kassis J Rodger M Hambleton J Gent M. Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003 Aug 14;349(7):631-9. PubMed



• Kolbach DN Sandbrick MW Hamulyak K Neumann HA Prins MH. Non-pharmaceutical measures for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome. In: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [internet]. Issue 3. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2003 [Art. No. CD004174].



• Leizorovicz A Simonneau G Decousus H Boissel JP. Comparison of efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a meta-analysis. BMJ 1994 Jul 30;309(6950):299-304. PubMed



• Leizorovicz A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis. An updated meta-analysis. Drugs 1996;52 Suppl 7:30-7. PubMed



• Martineau P Tawil N. Low-molecular-weight heparins in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis. Ann Pharmacother 1998 May;32(5):588-98 601. [76 references] PubMed



• Mewissen MW Seabrook GR Meissner MH Cynamon J Labropoulos N Haughton SH. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology 1999 Apr;211(1):39-49. PubMed



• Pinede L Duhaut P Cucherat M Ninet J Pasquier J Boissel JP. Comparison of long versus short duration of anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Intern Med 2000 May;247(5):553-62. PubMed



• Plate G Eklof B Norgren L Ohlin P Dahlstrom JA. Venous thrombectomy for iliofemoral vein thrombosis--10-year results of a prospective randomised study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997 Nov;14(5):367-74. PubMed



• Prandoni P Lensing AW Cogo A Cuppini S Villalta S Carta M Cattelan AM Polistena P Bernardi E Prins MH. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996 Jul 1;125(1):1-7. PubMed



• Ricotta S Iorio A Parise P Nenci GG Agnelli G. Post discharge clinically overt venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery patients with negative venography--an overview analysis. Thromb Haemost 1996 Dec;76(6):887-92. [56 references] PubMed



• Ridker PM Goldhaber SZ Danielson E Rosenberg Y Eby CS Deitcher SR Cushman M Moll S Kessler CM Elliott CG Paulson R Wong T Bauer KA Schwartz BA Miletich JP Bounameaux H Glynn RJ. Long-term low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003 Apr 10;348(15):1425-34. PubMed



• van der Belt AGM Prins MH Lensing AWA Castro AA Clark OAC Atallah AN Burihan E. Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) versus adjusted dose unfracionated heparin for venous thromboembolism. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane Library no: CD001100. In: The Cochrane Library [database online]. Issue 2. Oxford: Updates Software; 2004 



• van der Heijden JF Hutten BA Buller HR Prins MH. Vitamin K antagonists for low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. In: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [internet]. Issue 3. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2001 [Art. No. CD002001].



• van Dongen CJ MacGillavry MR Prins MH. Once versus twice daily LMWH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(3):CD003074. [59 references] PubMed



• Watson LI Armon MP. Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane Library Number: CD002783. In: Cochrane Library [database online]. Issue 4. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2004 



• Wells PS Anderson DR Bormanis J Guy F Mitchell M Gray L Clement C Robinson KS Lewandowski B. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997 Dec 20-27;350(9094):1795-8. PubMed

Type of Evidence supporting the Recommendations

Concise summaries of scientific evidence attached to the individual guidelines are the unique feature of the Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines. The evidence summaries allow the clinician to judge how well-founded the treatment recommendations are. The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for select recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

Potential Benefits

• Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis and identification of patient groups at risk
• Prevention of pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome in patients at risk
• Prevention of deep venous thrombosis in immobilised patients

Potential Harms

• Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) heparin and vitamin K antagonists can cause major bleeding complications.
• Unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) can cause thrombocytopenia.
• Local and generalized skin reactions and bleeding complications have been observed in studies in which low-molecular-weight heparin was used for thromboprophylaxis.
• In a systematic review of thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy the following major maternal events were reported: skin reactions bleeding complications thromboembolic events deep vein thrombosis bilateral renal vein thrombosis pulmonary emboli hepatic infarction and thrombophlebitis.
• Local thrombolytic therapy administered by catheter can result in complications.

Contraindications

The contraindications for use of fibrinolysis in venous thromboembolism are the same as in fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction.

Description of Implementation Strategy

An implementation strategy was not provided.

IOM Care Need

Getting Better
Staying Healthy

IOM Domain

Effectiveness

Bibliographic Source(s)

• Finnish Medical Society Duodecim. Deep vein thrombosis. In: EBM Guidelines. Evidence-Based Medicine [Internet]. Helsinki Finland: Wiley Interscience. John Wiley & Sons; 2006 Apr 27 [Various].

Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Source(s) of Funding

Finnish Medical Society Duodecim

Guideline Committee

Editorial Team of EBM Guidelines

Composition of Group that Authored the Guideline

Primary Authors: Editors

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

Not stated

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Finnish Medical Society Duodecim. Deep venous thrombosis. In: EBM Guidelines. Evidence-Based Medicine [CD-ROM]. Helsinki Finland: Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd.; 2006 Mar 15 [Various].

Guideline Availability

This guideline is included in "EBM Guidelines. Evidence-Based Medicine" available from Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd PO Box 713 00101 Helsinki Finland; e-mail: info@ebm-guidelines.com; Web site: www.ebm-guidelines.com.

Availability of Companion Documents

None available

Patient Resources

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on August 28 2001. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of October 26 2001. This summary was updated by ECRI on December 9 2002 July 1 2004 February 24 2005 and May 25 2006. This summary was updated by ECRI on March 6 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin sodium). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 22 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on heparin sodium injection. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on September 7 2007 following the revised U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 14 2008 following the updated FDA advisory on heparin sodium injection. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on December 26 2008 following the FDA advisory on Innohep (tinzaparin).

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop produce approve or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies relevant professional associations public or private organizations other government agencies health care organizations or plans and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC AHRQ and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC AHRQ or its contractor ECRI Institute and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.