Info for medical societies

Navigation

Shopping cart

Shopping cart is empty.

View cart

Guideline:

Guideline for laboratory diagnosis of malaria

National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC). Guideline summary: Guideline for laboratory diagnosis of malaria In: National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) [Web site]. Rockville (MD): cited 2007. Available: http://www.guideline.gov.


Bibliographic Source(s)

  • Bailey JW Williams J Bain BJ Parker-Williams J Chiodini P General Haematology Task Force. Guideline for laboratory diagnosis of malaria. London (UK): British Committee for Standards in Haematology; 2007. 19 p. [10 references]

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Guideline Category

Diagnosis

Intended Users

Clinical Laboratory Personnel
Physicians

Guideline Objective(s)

To recommend adequate techniques and adequate training and experience that will improve accurate malaria diagnosis

Target Population

Patients in the United Kingdom with suspected malaria

Interventions and Practices Considered

Primary Testing

  1. Thick film microscopy
  2. Thin film microscopy
  3. Preparation times and temperatures
  4. Fixative (acetone methanol)
  5. Stain (Giemsa Leishman's Field's May-Grunwald-Giemsa [MGG] modified Field's)
  6. Quantification of parasites
  7. Confirmation of diagnosis and species
  8. Referral to a reference laboratory
  9. Repeat testing
  10. Handling high-risk blood samples

Supplementary Testing

  1. Rapid antigen detection (immunochromatographic tests) – Binax NOW® and OptiMal-IT
  2. Quantitative buffy coat (QBC) blood parasite detection
  3. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
  4. Drug sensitivity (research only)

Quality Control (QC)

  1. Internal QC
  2. External QC (National External Quality Assessment Scheme)
  3. Clinical Pathology Accreditation
  4. Reference laboratory confirmation
  5. Personnel training

Major Outcomes Considered

Sensitivity and specificity of test procedures

Methods Used to Collect/Select Evidence

Searches of Electronic Databases

Description of Methods used to Collect/Select the Evidence

Not stated

Number of Source Documents

Not stated

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence

Not stated

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Not applicable

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Review

Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Not stated

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

Not stated

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Not applicable

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation

Not stated

Description of Method of Guideline Validation

Not applicable

Major Recommendations

  • The routine use of thick and thin films is advised for malaria diagnosis. Thick films should be exposed to acetone for 10 minutes then stained without further fixation using Giemsa or Field's stain. Thin films should be exposed to acetone for 1 minute and then either stained with a Leishman stain (methanol based) or methanol fixed and stained with a Giemsa stain. Thick films should be examined for an adequate period of time by two observers.
  • If thick films are positive the species should be determined by examination of a thin film. In the case of Plasmodium falciparum infection the percentage of parasitised cells should be estimated.
  • Rapid antigen detection tests (immunochromatographic tests) cannot replace microscopy but are indicated as a supplementary test when malaria diagnosis is being performed by relatively inexperienced staff (e.g. in low prevalence areas and outside normal working hours).

Clinical Algorithm(s)

None provided

Type of Evidence supporting the Recommendations

The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

Potential Benefits

Accurate qualitative and quantitative diagnosis of malaria

Potential Harms

Not stated

Description of Implementation Strategy

An implementation strategy was not provided.

IOM Care Need

Getting Better
Living with Illness

IOM Domain

Effectiveness
Timeliness

Bibliographic Source(s)

  • Bailey JW Williams J Bain BJ Parker-Williams J Chiodini P General Haematology Task Force. Guideline for laboratory diagnosis of malaria. London (UK): British Committee for Standards in Haematology; 2007. 19 p. [10 references]

Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Source(s) of Funding

British Committee for Standards in Haematology

Guideline Committee

Not stated

Composition of Group that Authored the Guideline

Authors: J. W Bailey; J. Williams; B. J. Bain; J Parker-Williams; P. Chio

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

Not stated

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Guideline Availability

Electronic copies: Available from the British Committee for Standards in Haematology Web site.

Print copies: Available from the British Committee for Standards in Haematology; Email: bcsh@b-s-h.org.uk.

Availability of Companion Documents

None available

Patient Resources

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on March 18 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on April 1 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline which is copyrighted by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. For more information contact the BCSH Secretary 100 White Lion Street London UK N1 9PF; Email: bcsh@b-s-h.org.uk.

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop produce approve or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies relevant professional associations public or private organizations other government agencies health care organizations or plans and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC AHRQ and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC AHRQ or its contractor ECRI Institute and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.