Guideline:
Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Gordon NF Gulanick M Costa F Fletcher G Franklin BA Roth EJ Shephard T. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology Subcommittee on Exercise Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention [trunc]. Circulation 2004 Apr 27;109(16):2031-41. [96 references] PubMed
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Category
Management
Prevention
Intended Users
Nurses
Physical Therapists
Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)
- To help bridge the current knowledge gap since most healthcare providers have limited experience and guidance in exercise programming for stroke survivors
- To prevent complications of prolonged inactivity in stroke survivors
- To decrease the incidence of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events
- To increase aerobic fitness in stroke survivors
Target Population
Stroke survivors
Interventions and Practices Considered
- Pre-exercise evaluation
- Exercise programming
- Aerobic training
- Strength training
- Flexibility training
- Neuromuscular (coordination and balance) training
- Identification of physical mental and psychological barriers to physical activity
Major Outcomes Considered
- Peak heart rate
- Percent of age-predicted maximum heart rate
- Peak metabolic equivalent test (MET)
- Blood pressure
- Exercise tolerance
- Peak oxygen consumption
- Ability to perform activities of daily life (ADL)
- Range of motion
Methods Used to Collect/Select Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Not stated
Number of Source Documents
Not stated
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Expert Consensus
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
Not applicable
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Systematic Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Not stated
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Not stated
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
Not applicable
Cost Analysis
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
Method of Guideline Validation
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
This statement was approved by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee on January 30 2004. It was published in Circulation 2004; 109: 2031-2041 and was co-published in the May 2004 issue of Stroke.
Major Recommendations
The Pre-exercise Evaluation
Exercise is a normal human function that can be undertaken with a high level of safety by most people including stroke survivors. However exercise is not without risks and the recommendation that stroke survivors participate in an exercise program is based on the premise that the benefits outweigh these risks. Therefore the foremost priority in formulating the exercise prescription is to minimize the potential adverse effects of exercise via appropriate screening program design monitoring and patient education.
As is the case for the general population the major potential health hazards of exercise for stroke survivors are likely to include musculoskeletal injury and sudden cardiac death. Depending on the severity of disability and other coexisting medical conditions certain patients may need to participate in a medically supervised exercise program. However before embarking on a physical conditioning regimen it is recommended that all stroke survivors undergo a complete medical history usually the most important part of the pre-exercise evaluation and a physical examination aimed at the identification of neurological complications and other medical conditions that require special consideration or constitute a contraindication to exercise.
From a pre-exercise evaluation perspective the most serious complication of exercise participation although rare is sudden cardiac death. Although habitual physical activity is associated with an overall reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death in the general adult population and the likelihood of experiencing a fatal cardiac event during exercise training is extremely small it is well established that exercise can precipitate malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Moreover several studies have now shown that the transiently increased risk of cardiac arrest that occurs during exercise results primarily from the presence of preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) especially in habitually sedentary adults. Because up to 75% of stroke victims have coexisting cardiac disease and 20% to 40% of asymptomatic stroke patients may have abnormal tests for silent cardiac ischemia it is recommended that stroke patients undergo graded exercise testing with electrocardiograph (ECG) monitoring as part of a medical evaluation before beginning an exercise program.
As discussed in another American Heart Association/American Stroke Association scientific statement there are limited data on the safety of graded exercise testing after a stroke. Available data suggest that graded exercise testing is likely to be associated with an acceptably low risk of serious cardiovascular complications in stroke patients.
Generally graded exercise testing in stroke patients should be conducted in accordance with contemporary guidelines as detailed elsewhere. Briefly the exercise test modality/protocol for the stroke survivor is selected to optimally assess functional capacity and the cardiovascular response to exercise. The test should evaluate the heart rate rhythm and ECG response to exercise as well as the systolic and diastolic blood pressure response. Careful assessment of the subjective response (especially cardiac symptoms) should be done. The testing mode should be selected or adapted to the needs of the stroke survivor. Often a standard treadmill walking protocol can be used (with the aid of handrails). The Bruce protocol (or a modified version) is appropriate for many subjects with a progressive workload achieved by increasing speed and grade of the treadmill. For some subjects however other modes are needed and special protocols are available for stroke survivors especially those with hemiplegia or paresis. Many testing protocols use arm cycle ergometry with the subject seated to optimize the load. Other protocols use arm-leg or leg cycle ergometry.
Thus if flexibility and adaptability are used in the selection of testing protocols most stroke survivors who are deemed stable for physical activity can undergo exercise testing. Such testing helps determine the subject’s exercise capacity and identify associated adverse signs or symptoms that may affect the safety of an exercise program. For patients with disabilities that preclude exercise testing pharmacological stress testing should be considered.
No studies have specifically addressed the issue of how soon after a stroke graded exercise testing can be performed safely. Until such data become available good clinical judgment should be foremost in deciding the timing of graded exercise testing after stroke and whether to use a submaximal or symptom-limited maximal test protocol. In the absence of definitive evidence it may be prudent to follow guidelines similar to those recommended for post–myocardial infarction patients and use submaximal protocols (with a predetermined end point often defined as a peak heart rate of 120 beats per minute (bpm) or 70% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate or a peak metabolic equivalent [MET] level of 5) if graded exercise testing is performed during the first 14 to 21 days after stroke. In the absence of definitive evidence it also appears prudent to consider a systolic blood pressure >250 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure >115 mm Hg an absolute (rather than relative) indication to terminate a graded exercise test in a stroke patient. As is recommended for patients with CAD the upper limit of the target heart rate range for subsequent exercise training should generally be at least 10 bpm below the heart rate associated with blood pressure responses of this magnitude.
From a practical standpoint it may not be possible for a variety of reasons for many stroke patients to perform an exercise test before they begin an exercise program. For patients for whom an exercise ECG is recommended but not performed lighter-intensity exercise should be prescribed. The reduced exercise intensity may be compensated for by increasing the training frequency duration or both.
In summary evaluation of the stroke survivor for an exercise program is multidimensional and includes a careful medical history and physical examination. Specific attention should focus on the results of an exercise test if available. If the evaluation is conducted with the aforementioned considerations an exercise program can be highly beneficial and safe for the stroke survivor.
Recommendations for Exercise Programming
Exercise programming recommendations for stroke survivors are summarized in the table below entitled "Summary of Exercise Programming Recommendations for Stroke Survivors." Prescribing exercise for the stroke patient is comparable in many ways to prescribing medications; that is one recommends an optimal dosage according to individual needs and limitations. Aerobic training modes may include leg arm or combined arm-leg ergometry at 40% to 70% of peak oxygen consumption or heart rate reserve with perceived exertion used as an adjunctive intensity modulator. The recommended frequency of training is 3 to 7 days a week with a duration of 20 to 60 min/d of continuous or accumulated exercise (e.g. ≥10-minute bouts) depending on the patient’s level of fitness. Intermittent training protocols may be needed during the initial weeks of rehabilitation because of the extremely deconditioned level of many convalescing stroke patients.
Table: Summary of Exercise Programming Recommendations for Stroke Survivors*
| Mode of Exercise | Major Goals | Intensity/Frequency/Duration** |
|---|---|---|
|
Aerobic: Large-muscle activities (e.g. walking treadmill stationary cycle combined arm-leg ergometry arm ergometry seated stepper) |
|
|
|
Strength:
|
|
|
|
Flexibility: Stretching |
|
|
|
Neuromuscular: Coordination and balance activities |
|
|
Notes
* Summary of exercise programming recommendations for stroke survivors (American College of Sports Medicine 2000; Fletcher et al. 2001; Palmer-McLean & Harbst 2003; Pollock et al 2000; Gordon 2003; American College of Sports Medicine 1998; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation 2004).
** Recommended intensity frequency and duration of exercise depend on each individual patient’s level of fitness. Intermittent training sessions may be indicated during the initial weeks of rehabilitation.
Treadmill training appears to offer 3 distinct advantages in the exercise rehabilitation of persons who have had a stroke. First it requires the performance of a task required for everyday living namely walking which should enhance the generalizability of training effects. Second the use of handrail support and "unweighting" devices (i.e. harnesses that serve to "lift" patients effectively decreasing their weight) allows patients to walk on a treadmill who might otherwise be unable to exercise. Third in patients with residual gait deviations exercise intensity can be augmented by increasing the treadmill grade while maintaining a comfortable speed.
To maximize the generalizability of the conditioning response to daily activities adjunctive upper-body and resistance-training programs are also recommended for clinically stable stroke patients. In one study 6 weeks of bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improved several key measures of sensorimotor impairments functional ability (performance time) and functional use in patients with chronic upper-extremity hemiparesis. Although there are no accepted guidelines for determining when and how to initiate resistance training after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke it may be prudent to prescribe 10 to 15 repetitions (i.e. higher repetitions with reduced loads) for each set of exercises rather than 8 to 12 repetitions similar to that recommended for post–myocardial infarction patients. Such regimens should be performed 2 to 3 days per week and include a minimum of 1 set of at least 8 to 10 exercises that involve the major muscle groups (arms shoulders chest abdomen back hips and legs). Some studies suggest that such regimens may promote gains in strength and gait velocity and that eccentric training may be more suitable for stroke patients than concentric training. Adjunctive flexibility and neuromuscular training to increase range of motion of the involved side prevent contractures and increase activities of daily living are also recommended.
Barriers to Physical Activity and Exercise Training in Stroke Patients
The evaluation of physiological and emotional barriers to post-stroke physical activity requires an evaluation of primary factors of stroke severity comorbidities and clinical deficits as well as secondary factors of familial support depression post-stroke fatigue social integration and cultural issues. Professional assessment and intervention relative to primary and secondary factors are important to help prevent a cycle of diminished motivation loss of engagement in activity deconditioning subsequent related acute illness (such as pneumonia) and a resultant need for temporary reinitiation of acute therapy.
As discussed previously the initial step to implementing an effective exercise regimen for post-stroke patients is a medical history and physical examination to identify physiological barriers. The combination of comorbidities and neurological deficits that are unique to each stroke survivor requires an individual approach to ensure that the patient can safely and effectively engage in a physical activity program. The evaluation of a stroke survivor for an exercise program involves acquisition of data from both the patient and his or her caregiver.
In addition to components of the pre-exercise evaluation already outlined the neurological examination should clarify the cognitive state and the Folstein Mini Mental Status examination can be a useful ancillary test in this regard. The degree of communication deficit (i.e. aphasia both expressive and receptive) will have a significant impact on the success of any rehabilitative program and alternative methods of communication may need to be sought and practiced in preparation for ongoing therapy.
A complete understanding by the patient family and clinical team of mutually derived goals current capabilities and safety issues will help to circumvent interpersonal barriers to treatment and should be integrated into the development of a therapeutic plan. In the context of defining therapy goals for the post-stroke patient it is essential that the family be integrated into the process as early as possible. Early involvement of the family unit has been strongly correlated with patient adherence to therapy better understanding between patient and caregiver of achievable outcomes and improved communication between patient and caregivers. To facilitate optimal outcomes from an exercise-based stroke rehabilitation program an assessment of familial support should be undertaken.
With the aging of the population and the escalation of health-care costs more of the burden of long-term care is being placed on family friends community or religious congregations. Of all patients needing home care after an illness approximately 80% receive at least part of their care from a family member. The significance of the assessment integration and care of the lay caregiver cannot be overemphasized. The stress of caring for the stroke patient can be overwhelming and frightening. The fatigue and depression of the stroke patient is translated directly to caregivers and thus the effectiveness of a prescribed exercise program will depend on them as well. When applicable an assessment of family functioning with a tool such as the McMaster Family Assessment Device may serve to enhance adherence and improve long-term outcomes.
A primary barrier to any type of post-stroke therapy is depression. The incidence of post-stroke depression ranges from 18% to 68%. The initial steps of designing a physical activity regimen for stroke patients should include an assessment for depression. Depression screening can be performed with 1 of 4 depression scales recommended in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Guidelines. These are the Beck depression inventory the Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale (CES-D) the geriatric depression scale (GDS) and the Hamilton depression scale. Screening scales should be administered by a professional knowledgeable about the scale its application and its interpretation. If warranted further assessment and treatment should be coordinated by a mental health professional preferably one who has experience in geriatrics and stroke care. The proper assessment for depression will affect patient and caregiver motivation positively. When prescribed the use of antidepressants should be evaluated regularly in an effort to prevent exacerbation of sleep disturbance or post-stroke fatigue.
Post-stroke fatigue with or without depression is reported to occur in 39% of patients but is relatively understudied in the stroke population. Without an assessment of fatigue symptoms attempts at implementing a physical conditioning regimen for post-stroke patients may prove difficult and frustrating. A thorough assessment for fatigue syndromes may help the clinician differentiate between neurological and physiological fatigue. The patient should have an understanding that neurological fatigue syndromes may never be resolved completely and that long-term adaptation in activity routines may be required.
For patients who experience fatigue syndromes an evaluation of temporality (i.e. sudden versus persistent) and intensity will assist in determining the optimal duration and intensity for exercise and physical activity. Although there are relatively few clinical trials in the treatment of post-stroke fatigue at least 1 study has demonstrated that low-intensity aerobic exercise over a period of 6 months will improve cardiac function and reduce energy demands in patients with hemiparetic gait thus preventing deconditioning and the associated consequences of physical inactivity.
Although certain post-stroke complications are prevented by physical conditioning leisure-time activities may also be helpful in this regard. Such activities are part of a process of socialization. As a person grows older and experiences cognitive or physical limitations they tend to give up these activities which in turn may lead to social withdrawal and isolation. This tendency may be compounded in the stroke patient. Because of difficulty with mobility perceived social stigma related to physical or cognitive deficits or depression many stroke patients become socially isolated. Social isolation is also strongly correlated with post-stroke depression. When family members are primary caregivers for the stroke survivor they too may become socially isolated which will further limit the potential venues for physical activity and exercise.
When withdrawn socially stroke patients are not likely to venture into the neighborhood for walks use the public swimming pool for low-impact aquatic training or travel to a local gym for exercise classes. Studies have shown that even in stroke survivors with a significant degree of physical recovery social isolation was still evident. Many stroke patients will not have equipment or facilities in their home to sustain interest in an exercise program in the long term. They will need to seek assistance equipment and facilities in the community. To enhance exercise compliance the issue of social isolation will need to be actively addressed and resolved.
It is a standard in a caring and empathetic clinical practice to be aware of and facilitate cultural diversity. In creating and implementing any type of recovery program for the stroke survivor it is necessary to be aware of cultural differences that may affect acceptance or adherence. It is unlikely that one specific set of recommendations could guide clinicians through the cultural diversity they are likely to experience in practice. However the design and implementation of a physical exercise regimen should be sensitive to cultural differences in modesty assertiveness or expected social roles. The integration of patient and family cultural norms will help create a program that is more likely to succeed over the long term.
The complex interplay between physiological and emotional barriers to continuing recovery after a stroke demand creative and individualized rehabilitative programs to be designed and implemented by a multidisciplinary team. The relevant clinical emotional and social variations present in each stroke survivor preclude the application of a template to post-stroke rehabilitation. When applicable tools are used to assess the individual for physiological and emotional barriers and known and adapted techniques to remove or ameliorate such barriers are applied each patient is best prepared to reach their optimal state of function and well-being.
Refer to the last section of the original guideline document entitled "Importance of Comprehensive Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction" for further information.
Clinical Algorithm(s)
None provided
References Supporting the Recommendations
- American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2004.
- American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998 Jun;30(6):975-91. [262 references] PubMed
- American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
- Fletcher GF Balady GJ Amsterdam EA Chaitman B Eckel R Fleg J Froelicher VF Leon AS Pina IL Rodney R Simons-Morton DA Williams MA Bazzarre T. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2001 Oct 2;104(14):1694-740. PubMed
- Gordon NF. Hypertension. In: Durstine JL Moore GE editor(s). ACSM's exercise management for persons with chronic diseases and disabilities. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2003. p. 76-80.
- Palmer-McLean K Harbst KB. Stroke and brain injury. In: Durstine JL Moore GE editor(s). ACSM's exercise management for persons with chronic diseases and disabilities. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2003. p. 238-46.
- Pollock ML Franklin BA Balady GJ Chaitman BL Fleg JL Fletcher B Limacher M Pina IL Stein RA Williams M Bazzarre T. AHA Science Advisory. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: benefits rationale safety and prescription: An advisory from the Committee on Exercise Rehabilitation and Prevention Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2000 Feb 22;101(7):828-33. [36 references] PubMed
Type of Evidence supporting the Recommendations
The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.
Potential Benefits
- Increased knowledge of exercise programming and its benefits
- Appropriate patient guidance regarding physical activity and exercise
Potential Harms
- As is the case for the general population the major potential health hazards of exercise for stroke survivors are likely to include musculoskeletal injury and sudden cardiac death.
- From a pre-exercise evaluation perspective the most serious complication of exercise participation although rare is sudden cardiac death. Although habitual physical activity is associated with an overall reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death in the general adult population and the likelihood of experiencing a fatal cardiac event during exercise training is extremely small it is well established that exercise can precipitate malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
- As discussed in another American Heart Association/American Stroke Association scientific statement there are limited data on the safety of graded exercise testing after a stroke. Available data suggest that graded exercise testing is likely to be associated with an acceptably low risk of serious cardiovascular complications in stroke patients.
Description of Implementation Strategy
An implementation strategy was not provided.
Implementation Tools
Tool Kits
For information about availability see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.
IOM Care Need
Getting Better
Living with Illness
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Gordon NF Gulanick M Costa F Fletcher G Franklin BA Roth EJ Shephard T. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology Subcommittee on Exercise Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention [trunc]. Circulation 2004 Apr 27;109(16):2031-41. [96 references] PubMed
Adaptation
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
Source(s) of Funding
American Heart Association
Guideline Committee
Council on Clinical Cardiology
(Subcommittee on Exercise Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention)
Council on Cardiovascular Nursing
Council on Nutrition Physical Activity and Metabolism
Stroke Council
Composition of Group that Authored the Guideline
Primary Authors: Neil F. Gordon MD PhD Cochair; Meg Gulanick PhD APRN Cochair; Fernando Costa MD Gerald Fletcher MD; Barry A. Franklin PhD; Elliot J. Roth MD; Tim Shephard RN MSN
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal professional or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Availability
Electronic copies: Available from the American Heart Association Web site:
Print copies: Available from the American Heart Association Public Information 7272 Greenville Ave Dallas TX 75231-4596; Phone: 800-242-8721
Availability of Companion Documents
Get With the Guidelines (GWTG) provides disease-specific process documents and tools for in-house quality improvement. See the American Heart Association Web site for more information. See the related QualityTool summary on the Health Care Innovations Exchange Web site for this related tool set.
Patient Resources
None available
NGC STATUS
This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 8 2004. The information was verified by the guideline developer on December 14 2004. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on November 6 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Antidepressant drugs.
COPYRIGHT STATEMENT
This summary is based on the original guideline which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop produce approve or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies relevant professional associations public or private organizations other government agencies health care organizations or plans and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .
NGC AHRQ and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC AHRQ or its contractor ECRI Institute and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.