Guideline:
Stroke management and prevention in the long-term care setting
Bibliographic Source(s)
- American Medical Directors Association (AMDA). Stroke management and prevention in the long-term care setting. Columbia (MD): American Medical Directors Association (AMDA); 2005. 42 p. [83 references]
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Category
Diagnosis
Evaluation
Management
Prevention
Rehabilitation
Risk Assessment
Treatment
Intended Users
Advanced Practice Nurses
Allied Health Personnel
Dietitians
Health Care Providers
Nurses
Occupational Therapists
Pharmacists
Physical Therapists
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Social Workers
Speech-Language Pathologists
Guideline Objective(s)
- To improve the quality of care for patients with stroke in long-term care settings
- To guide care decisions and to define roles and responsibilities of appropriate care staff
- To reduce the risk of recurrent strokes
Target Population
Residents of long-term care facilities
Interventions and Practices Considered
Prevention/Risk Assessment
- Assessment of risk factors for stroke
- Preventive measures
- Monitoring physical functional and psychological progress
Evaluation/Diagnosis
- Assessment and description of resident's signs and symptoms
- Medical history
- Assessment for conditions that mimic stroke
- Assessment of appropriateness of transferring the patient to a hospital
- Diagnostic evaluation
- Multidisciplinary functional assessment
- Summarizing the patient's condition
Treatment/Rehabilitation/Management
- Treatment of medical conditions that may accompany or mimic an acute stroke
- Multidisciplinary care plan and treatment for stroke complications including appropriate curative restorative or palliative measures
- Rehabilitation plan and follow up
Major Outcomes Considered
- Cause of death among stroke survivors
- Risk for stroke or stroke recurrence
- Risk and incidence of stroke complications such as pneumonia urinary tract infection urinary incontinence and bladder dysfunction dementia deep vein thrombosis depression pressure ulcers
- Stroke-related mortality
- Effect of antiplatelet therapy
- Benefits and risks of interventions used to prevent/treat strokes
Methods Used to Collect/Select Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Not stated
Number of Source Documents
Not stated
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
Quality of Published Evidence
I Evidence from at least one properly randomized controlled trial
II-1 Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without randomization
II-2 Evidence from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies preferably from more than one center or research group
II-3 Evidence from comparisons between times or places with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments could also be included here.
III Opinions of respected authorities based on clinical experience descriptive studies or reports of expert committees
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review of Published Meta-Analyses
Systematic Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Not stated
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Interdisciplinary workgroups developed the guidelines using a process that combined evidence and consensus-based approaches. Workgroups included practitioners and others involved in patient care in long-term care facilities. Beginning with a general guideline developed by an agency association or organization such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) pertinent articles and information and a draft outline each group worked to make a concise usable guideline tailored to the long-term care setting. Because scientific research in the long-term care population is limited many recommendations were based on the expert opinion of practitioners in the field.
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
- Good evidence to support the recommendation
- Fair evidence to support the recommendation
- Poor evidence but recommendations may be made on other grounds
Cost Analysis
The guideline developers reviewed a published cost analysis.
Method of Guideline Validation
External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
All American Medical Director Association (AMDA) clinical practice guidelines undergo external review. The draft guideline is sent to approximately 175+ reviewers. These reviewers include American Medical Director Association physician members and independent physicians specialists and organizations that are knowledgeable of the guideline topic and the long-term care setting.
Major Recommendations
The algorithm Stroke Management and Prevention in the Long-Term Care Setting is to be used in conjunction with the clinical practice guideline. The numbers next to the different components of the algorithm correspond with the steps in the text. Refer to the "Guideline Availability" field for information on obtaining the full text guideline.
Clinical Algorithm(s)
An algorithm is provided for Stroke Management and Prevention in the Long-Term Care Setting
Type of Evidence supporting the Recommendations
The guideline was developed by an interdisciplinary work group using a process that combined evidence- and consensus-based thinking.
Potential Benefits
- Timely recognition of acute stroke
- Improved monitoring for and recognition of acute complications of stroke
- Minimization of acute stroke complications
- Improved control of modifiable risk factors for stroke
- Improved utilization of appropriate anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapies
- Improved quality of life for patients with stroke
- Improved documentation of patient choices about assessments and treatments
Potential Harms
- Hospital transfer of long-term care stroke patients is associated with the following risks:
- Deconditioning
- Delirium
- Pressure ulcers
- Use of restraints
- Use of indwelling urinary catheters
- Inappropriate medications for frail elderly causing adverse drug effects
- Other adverse iatrogenic events
- Common compensatory strategies such as chin-tuck positioning dietary modifications and thickened liquids may improve some symptoms or findings on videofluoroscopy but these intermediate outcomes do not necessarily translate into reductions in the incidence of aspiration pneumonia. In addition modified diets and thickened liquids have potential adverse effects including weight loss dehydration and reduced quality of life
Adverse Effects of Medications
- Baclofen and dantrolene may be associated with somnolence.
- Aspirin is associated with gastrointestinal toxicity and bleeding.
- Aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole (ER-DP) is superior to aspirin alone but is more expensive requires twice-daily dosing and has an adverse-effect profile that combines the side effects of both aspirin and ER-DP.
- Severe gastrointestinal bleeding occurred less frequently among patients on clopidogrel than among those taking aspirin. Combining aspirin and clopidogrel produces no additional benefit and increases serious adverse effects.
Contraindications
Refer to Table 13 in the original guideline document for absolute and relative contraindications to warfarin use in older persons with atrial fibrillation.
Qualifying Statements
- This clinical practice guideline is provided for discussion and educational purposes only and should not be used or in any way relied upon without consultation with and supervision of a qualified physician based on the case history and medical condition of a particular patient. The American Medical Directors Association and the American Health Care Association their heirs executors administrators successors and assigns hereby disclaim any and all liability for damages of whatever kind resulting from the use negligent or otherwise of this clinical practice guideline.
- The utilization of the American Medical Director Association's Clinical Practice Guideline does not preclude compliance with State and Federal regulation as well as facility policies and procedures. They are not substitutes for the experience and judgment of clinicians and care-givers. The Clinical Practice Guidelines are not to be considered as standards of care but are developed to enhance the clinician's ability to practice.
- Long-term care facilities care for a variety of individuals including younger patients with chronic diseases and disabilities short-stay patients needing postacute care and very old and frail individuals suffering from multiple comorbidities. When a workup or treatment is suggested it is crucial to consider if such a step is appropriate for a specific individual. A workup may not be indicated if the patient has a terminal or end-stage condition if it would not change the management course if the burden of the workup is greater than the potential benefit or if the patient or his or her proxy would refuse treatment. It is important to carefully document in the patient's medical record the reasons for decisions not to treat or perform a workup or for choosing one treatment approach over another.
Description of Implementation Strategy
The implementation of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is outlined in four phases. Each phase presents a series of steps which should be carried out in the process of implementing the practices presented in this guideline. Each phase is summarized below.
- Recognition
- Define the area of improvement and determine if there is a CPG available for the defined area. Then evaluate the pertinence and feasibility of implementing the CPG.
- Assessment
- Define the functions necessary for implementation and then educate and train staff. Assess and document performance and outcome indicators and then develop a system to measure outcomes.
- Implementation
- Identify and document how each step of the CPG will be carried out and develop an implementation timetable.
- Identify individual responsible for each step of the CPG.
- Identify support systems that impact the direct care.
- Educate and train appropriate individuals in specific CPG implementation and then implement the CPG.
- Monitoring
- Evaluate performance based on relevant indicators and identify areas for improvement.
- Evaluate the predefined performance measures and obtain and provide feedback.
Implementation Tools
Clinical Algorithm
Tool Kits
For information about availability see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.
IOM Care Need
Living with Illness
Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Bibliographic Source(s)
- American Medical Directors Association (AMDA). Stroke management and prevention in the long-term care setting. Columbia (MD): American Medical Directors Association (AMDA); 2005. 42 p. [83 references]
Adaptation
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
Guideline Developer Comment
Organizational participants included:
- American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging
- American College of Health Care Administrators
- American Geriatrics Society
- American Health Care Association
- American Society of Consultant Pharmacists
- National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long-Term Care
- National Association of Geriatric Nursing Assistants
- National Conference of Gerontological Nurse Practitioners
Source(s) of Funding
American Medical Directors Association
Guideline Committee
Steering Committee
Composition of Group that Authored the Guideline
Naushira Pandya MD CMD Project Chair
Steven Levenson MD CMD Clinical Practice Committee Chair
Steering Committee Members: Donna Brickley RN; Harlan Martin R.Ph. CCP FASCP; Lisa Cantrell RN C; Geri Mendelson RN CNAA M.Ed NHA; Charles Cefalu MD MS; Evvie F. Munley; Sandra Fitzler RN; Jonathan Musher MD CMD; Joseph Gruber RPh FASCP CGP; Mariann Piver RNCCDON/LTC; Larry Lawhorne MD CMD; Mary Tellis-Nayak RN MSN; Steven Levenson MD CMD; Barbara Resnick PhD CRNP; Susan M. Levy MD CMD; William Simonson Pharm.D. FASCP
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
Not stated
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Availability
Electronic copies: None available.
Print copies: Available from the American Medical Directors Association 10480 Little Patuxent Pkwy Suite 760 Columbia MD 21044. Telephone: (800) 876-2632 or (410) 740-9743; Fax (410) 740-4572. Web site: www.amda.com
Availability of Companion Documents
The following are available:
- Guideline implementation: clinical practice guidelines. Columbia MD: American Medical Directors Association 1998 28 p.
- We care: implementing clinical practice guidelines tool kit. Columbia MD: American Medical Directors Association 2003.
Electronic copies: None available
Print copies: Available from the American Medical Directors Association 10480 Little Patuxent Pkwy Suite 760 Columbia MD 21044. Telephone: (800) 876-2632 or (410) 740-9743; Fax (410) 740-4572. Web site: www.amda.com
Patient Resources
None available
NGC STATUS
This summary was completed by ECRI on June 29 2005. The information was verified by the guideline developer on August 8 2005. This summary was updated by ECRI on March 6 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin sodium). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on September 7 2007 following the revised U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin).
COPYRIGHT STATEMENT
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions. For more information please contact the American Medical Directors Association (AMDA) at (800) 876-2632.
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop produce approve or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies relevant professional associations public or private organizations other government agencies health care organizations or plans and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .
NGC AHRQ and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC AHRQ or its contractor ECRI Institute and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.