ACEP Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Recommendations
Document Overview

Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

American College of Emergency Physicians


Publication Date: Nov 1, 2018

Page Last Updated: May 6, 2026


Level of Recommendation


Document Overview

Document Title
Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Authoring Society

American College of Emergency Physicians

Document Publication Date
Nov 1, 2018
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 6, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.acep.org/globalassets/new-pdfs/clinical-policies/nste.acs.2.2018.final.pdf
Source Citation

Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72:e65-e106.


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives
This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians addresses key issues in the evaluation and management of patients with suspected non–STelevation acute coronary syndromes.
Scope
Assessment and Screening, Management, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D004635 - Emergency Medicine

D009203 - Myocardial Infarction

D000072658 - Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction

D009203 - Myocardial Infarction

D004635 - Emergency Medicine

D000072658 - Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction

Keywords
emergency medicine, myocardial infarction (MI), nstemi
Target Patient Population
Patients with NSTEMI
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Male, Adolescent, Adult, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Emergency Care
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Paramedic/EMT, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Number of Source Documents
104
Literature Search Start Date
Saturday, January 1, 2005
Literature Search End Date
Friday, December 8, 2017
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
Yes
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
Yes
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.