AAN Intraoperative Spinal Monitoring with Somatosensory and Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Document Overview

Document Overview

Document Title
Intraoperative Spinal Monitoring with Somatosensory and Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials
Authoring Society

American Academy of Neurology

Endorsing Society

American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Document Publication Date
Feb 21, 2012
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 6, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
n.neurology.org/content/78/8/585.full
Source Citation

Evidence-based guideline update: Intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. M.R. Nuwer, R.G. Emerson, G. Galloway, A.D. Legatt, J. Lopez, R. Minahan, T. Yamada, D.S. Goodin, C. Armon, V. Chaudhry, G.S. Gronseth, C.L. Harden. Neurology Feb 2012, 78 (8) 585-589; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318247fa0e
 


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives
To evaluate whether spinal cord intraoperative monitoring (IOM) with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (EPs) predicts adverse surgical outcomes.
Scope
Assessment and Screening, Prevention
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D016343 - Monitoring, Intraoperative

D064795 - Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring

D016343 - Monitoring, Intraoperative

D064795 - Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring

Keywords
intraoperative monitoring, transcranial electrical
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Male, Adult, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Operating and Recovery Room, Outpatient
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Supplemental Methodology Resources
Data Supplement Data Supplement
Number of Source Documents
26
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
No
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
No
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
Yes
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
No
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.