IDSA Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Pharyngitis: Risk Assessment Using Clinical Scoring Systems in Children and Adults Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Summary of Recommendations
Document Overview

Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Pharyngitis: Risk Assessment Using Clinical Scoring Systems in Children and Adults

Infectious Diseases Society of America


Publication Date: Oct 14, 2025

Page Last Updated: May 6, 2026


Recommendation Grading


Document Overview

Document Title
Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Pharyngitis: Risk Assessment Using Clinical Scoring Systems in Children and Adults
Authoring Society

Infectious Diseases Society of America

Endorsing Societies

American Society for Microbiology

Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Document Publication Date
Oct 14, 2025
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 6, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/streptococcal-pharyngitis2/
Source Citation

Linder JA, Watson ME, Wessels MR, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Pharyngitis. Idsociety.org. Published 2025. https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/streptococcalpharyngitis2/


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives

This publication represents the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal (Streptococcus pyogenes or GAS) pharyngitis, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis by clinician judgement alone is unreliable, and unselective testing incurs cost and inconvenience for individuals at low risk of having GAS infection. Clinical scoring systems have been used to quantify the probability of a positive GAS throat culture based on standardized criteria such as the presence of fever; tonsillar enlargement or exudate; tender and enlarged anterior cervical lymph nodes; and the absence of cough. The goal of this paper is to determine whether a scoring system should be used to decide which patients should have a diagnostic test performed by rapid antigen detection test (RADT), molecular methods, and/or throat culture. We performed a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized studies that compared the use of a clinical scoring system to clinician judgement alone in predicting the outcome of a throat culture. Evidence from studies in children and adults suggests the diagnostic accuracy of a clinical scoring system is comparable to or slightly higher than clinician judgement alone. However, the studies are limited due to small size, lack of uniformity in outcome measures, and incomplete data. The consensus of the panel is that the balance of benefits and harms favors use of a clinical scoring system as part of the evaluation of patients with sore throat. The principal utility of using a scoring system is to identify patients with low probability of GAS pharyngitis and to reduce unnecessary testing.
 

Scope
Assessment and Screening, Diagnosis, Management
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D013290 - Streptococcal Infections

D025362 - Streptogramin Group A

D013297 - Streptococcus pyogenes

D013290 - Streptococcal Infections

D025362 - Streptogramin Group A

D013297 - Streptococcus pyogenes

Keywords
Group A streptococcal pharyngitis, Streptococcus pyogenes, strep pharyngitis
Target Patient Population
Children and adults with sore throat
Target Provider Population
Primary care providers and specialists caring for children and adults with sore throat
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Supplemental Methodology Resource
Data Supplement
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.