ASRM Uterine Septum Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Summary
Recommendations
Document Overview

Uterine Septum

American Society for Reproductive Medicine


Publication Date: Sep 1, 2016

Page Last Updated: May 5, 2026


ASRM Evidence Grading System

 

Document Overview

Document Title
Uterine Septum
Authoring Society

American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Document Publication Date
Sep 1, 2016
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 5, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(16)61281-5/fulltext
Source Citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.014


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives
The purpose of this guideline is to review the literature regarding septate uterus and determine optimal indications and methods of treatment for it. Septate uterus has been associated with an increase in the risk of miscarriage, premature delivery, and malpresentation; however, there is insufficient evidence that a uterine septum is associated with infertility. 
Scope
Assessment and Screening, Counseling, Management, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D007247 - Infertility, Female

D007246 - Infertility

D014599 - Uterus

D014591 - Uterine Diseases

D007246 - Infertility

D007247 - Infertility, Female

D014599 - Uterus

D014591 - Uterine Diseases

Keywords
infertility, uterine septum
Target Patient Population
Patient with uterine septum
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Adolescent, Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Hospital, Operating and Recovery Room, Outpatient
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Number of Source Documents
59
Literature Search End Date
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
Includes peer/external review process?
No
Includes public comment process?
No
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
No
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
No
Discloses conflicts of interest?
No
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
No
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.