Affecting more than one-third of adults in the US, obesity remains a pressing health challenge for both providers and patients, conferring significant risk for comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, and cardiovascular disease. While lifestyle modifications and medical therapies, including anti-obesity medications (AOM), can be effective for some, they often fall short in achieving sustained weight loss and improved health for many patients. Bariatric surgery emerges as a crucial tool when conservative measures are insufficient, offering significant, long-term benefits for those with severe obesity.
This article explores current clinical practice guidance documents for managing bariatric surgery patients, comparing and highlighting recommendations regarding patient selection, procedural choices, and perioperative complications from various leading medical societies. In analyzing the evolving recommendations on the use of surgical interventions in the comprehensive treatment of obesity, this Guidelines Side-By-Side aims to equip healthcare providers with the insights needed to optimize bariatric surgery patient care through evidence-based, personalized treatment strategies.

Titles of Comparison:

  • 2024 Obesity Algorithm - Management of the Bariatric Surgery Patient
    • Published by the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) on February 2024.
    • Objective: Provides ungraded recommendations and guidance for the management of bariatric surgery patients, including nutrient considerations, as a part of the 2024 Obesity Algorithm.
    • Target Population: Adults with indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery
    • Methodology: Ungraded key takeaway recommendations
    • Graded Strength of Recommendations: No
    • Graded Level of Evidence: No
    • Systematic Review Conducted: Not stated
    • Literature Review Conducted: Yes
    • Internal Review Conducted: Yes
    • External Review Conducted: Not stated
    • COIs & Funding Source(s) Disclosed: Yes
    • Pocket Guide | Full-text
  • Perioperative Nutritional, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of the Bariatric Surgery Patient
    • Published by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), The Obesity Society (TOS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) on November 2019.
    • Objective: This 2019 clinical practice guideline (CPG) update provides revised clinical management recommendations that incorporate evidence from 2013 to the present, and identifies patient candidates for bariatric procedures, discusses which types of bariatric procedures should be offered, outlines management of patients before procedures, and recommends how to optimize patient care during and after procedures. 
    • Target Population: Adults with indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery
    • Methodology: AACE Protocol for Standardized Production of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Algorithms, and Checklists – 2017 Update
    • Graded Strength of Recommendations: Yes (A: Strong, B: Intermediate, C: Weak, D: No conclusive evidence and/or expert opinion)
    • Graded Level of Evidence: Yes (H: High, H-I: Intermediate High, I: Intermediate, L-I: Low-Intermediate, L: Low, L-E: Low/Expert Opinion)
    • Systematic Review Conducted: Yes
    • Literature Review Conducted: Yes
    • Internal Review Conducted: Yes
    • External Review Conducted: Not stated
    • COIs & Funding Source(s) Disclosed: Yes
    • Pocket Guide | Full-text
  • Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
    • Published by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) on October 2022.
    • Objective: This joint statement is an update to the 1991 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus statement, which sought to address “the surgical treatments for severe obesity and the criteria for selection, the efficacy and risks of surgical treatments for severe obesity, and the need for future research on and epidemiological evaluation of these therapies,” and included specific recommendations for practice. 
    • Target Population: Adult and pediatric patients with indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery
    • Methodology: Not stated
    • Graded Strength of Recommendations: No
    • Graded Level of Evidence: No
    • Systematic Review Conducted: Not stated
    • Literature Review Conducted: Yes
    • Internal Review Conducted: Not stated
    • External Review Conducted: Not stated
    • COIs & Funding Source(s) Disclosed: Not stated
    • Pocket Guide | Full-text

Comparison Content:

Key Takeaways:

Indications for bariatric surgery by BMI:

  • Recommended candidates for bariatric & metabolic surgery include patients with:
    • BMI > 40 recommended by all societies
    • BMI > 35 with:
      • One or more associated obesity-related complications recommended by OMA and AACE
      • AMSBS recommends BMI ≥35, regardless of presence, absence, or severity of comorbidities.
    • BMI >30 with:
      • AACE: BMI 30 to 34.9 and T2D with inadequate glycemic control despite optimal lifestyle and medical therapy
      • OMA & ASMBS recommend in patients with T2D and BMI ≥30, as well as BMI >30 who did not show substantial or durable weight loss or co-morbidity improvement using nonsurgical methods
    • Ethnicity-related BMI considerations:
      • In Asian patient populations, BMI ≥25 kg/m2 suggests clinical obesity, and individuals with BMI ≥27.5 kg/m2 should be offered MBS recommended by all societies
    • Special patient population considerations:
      • Only discussed by ASMBS/IFSO, recommend no upper age limit for bariatric and metabolic surgery, but fragility is independently associated with higher rates of postoperative complications 
      • Only discussed by ASMBS/IFSO, children and adolescents with BMI >120% of the 95th percentile and a major comorbidity, or a BMI >140% of the 95th percentile, should be considered for MBS

Recommendations and considerations by procedure:

  • Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB):
    • Recommended by AACE to be considered as a primary bariatric and metabolic procedure for patients requiring weight loss and/or improvement in obesity-related complications
      • Note: OMA notes that increased risk of malabsorption with this procedure compared to sleep
    • All societies recommend RYGB for benefits for improvement in T2DM and related diabetic complications
      • ASMBS include note that Benefits of RYGB on T2D and hypertension are greater in adolescents than adults
  • Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB):
    • Recommended by AACE to be considered as a primary bariatric and metabolic procedure for patients requiring weight loss and/or improvement in obesity-related complications
      • Note: OMA notes that optimally suited for lower BMI patients and those with no metabolic disease
    • ASMBS recommend for benefits related to joint health and ability to potentially avoid joint arthroplasties after weight loss from the LAGB procedure
  • Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS):
    • Recommended by AACE to be considered as a primary bariatric and metabolic procedure for patients requiring weight loss and/or improvement in obesity-related complications
      • Note: OMA notes optimally suited for patients with higher BMI and T2DM, and while it may result in greatest weight loss benefit, it is associated with the highest rates of post-op vitamin & mineral deficiencies
      • ASMBS 2022 guidelines did not discuss this procedure
  • Loop Duodenal Switch:
    • Recommended by AACE to be considered as a primary bariatric and metabolic procedure for patients requiring weight loss and/or improvement in obesity-related complications
      • Note: OMA notes optimally suited for patients with higher BMI and T2DM, but long-term data for post-op monitoring/complications for this procedure was not available
      • ASMBS 2022 guidelines did not discuss this procedure
      • Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) & Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG)
      • VSG recommended by AACE to be considered as a primary bariatric and metabolic procedure for patients requiring weight loss and/or improvement in obesity-related complications
        • AACE recommended use of preoperative endoscopy to be considered in all patients being evaluated for sleeve gastrectomy (ESG or VSG)
        • Note: OMA notes VSG can worsen GERD & Barrett’s esophagus, with AACE recommendation for PPI post-op for patients with de novo gastroesophageal reflex

As we navigate the intricate guidelines for bariatric surgery from OMA, AACE, ASMBS and other collaborating medical societies, a thorough understanding of these diverse recommendations can greatly enhance the care provided to obesity weight management patients. Integrating these guidelines ensures a comprehensive approach to obesity management, tailored to each patient’s unique needs. Staying vigilant and adaptable in evaluating evolving recommendations helps refine surgical weight management strategies, fostering collaborative decision-making and paving the way for each patient’s journey toward improved health and well-being.

Make sure to sign up for guideline alerts on guidelinecentral.com to stay up to date on all future side-by-side blogs and let us know if there is a topic you’d like to see compared on our next article!


Copyright © 2024 Guideline Central, All Rights Reserved.