Hemophilia A and B, the most common severe hereditary bleeding disorders, arise from deficiencies in factor VIII and factor IX, respectively. These conditions result in prolonged bleeding episodes, which can occur spontaneously or with minimal trauma, depending on the level of factor activity. Apart from treating acute bleeding, prophylaxis is a key strategy in hemophilia management. Prophylactic treatment significantly reduces the frequency of hemarthroses, thereby mitigating hemophilic arthropathy and the need for corrective joint surgeries. It also lowers the incidence of cerebral and muscle bleeds, decreases hospitalizations, and enhances patients' quality of life by reducing time off work and less frequent monitoring.

To support this practice, this Guidelines Side-By-Side article will take a deep dive into hemophilia management recommendations by making a side-by-side comparison of the current clinical practice guidelines from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH). In examining these recommendations and analyzing the recommendations from leading medical societies, the article can help to equip healthcare providers with critical insights and best practices to enhance the management of hemophilia and ensure comprehensive, interprofessional care for affected individuals and their families.

Titles of Comparison:

  • Treatment of Congenital Hemophilia A and B
    • Society: International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)
    • Publication Date: June 2024
    • Objective: This clinical practice guideline from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis aims to provide an evidence-based hemophilia treatment approach based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to support patients, caregivers, hematologists, pediatricians, other clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders in treatment decisions about congenital hemophilia A and B.
    • Target Population: Adults and children with hemophilia
    • Methodology: GRADE
    • Graded Strength of Recommendations: Yes
    • Graded Level of Evidence: Yes
    • Systematic Review Conducted: Yes
    • Literature Review Conducted: Yes
    • COIs & Funding Source(s) Disclosed: Yes
  • Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition
    • Society: World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) 
    • Publication Date: August 2020
    • Objective: This new edition provides principles of care that aims to provide a framework for development of a comprehensive healthcare system for hemophilia including advocacy and empowerment for people with hemophilia (PWH). The recommendations in this edition were all developed through a formal evidence-­informed and consensus-­based methodology involving multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (HCPs) and well-­informed PWH. While directed primarily at HCPs, these guidelines should also be very useful for PWH as well as advocacy organizations.
    • Target Population: Adults and children with hemophilia
    • Methodology: Incorporated the Trustworthy Consensus-Based Statement (TCBS) approaches with a modified Delphi approach for guideline recommendations
    • Graded Strength of Recommendations: WFH guideline recommendations recommendations were not graded as the vast majority of the evidence base in the field, given the barriers to clinical research and data collection in rare diseases, is insufficient to support meta-analyses, but were clearly marked “CB” for consensus-based.
    • Graded Level of Evidence: No
    • Systematic Review Conducted: Yes
    • Literature Review Conducted: Yes
    • COIs & Funding Source(s) Disclosed: Yes
    • Summary | Patient Summary | Full Text

Comparison Content:

Key Takeaways:

Prophylaxis Recommendations:

  • Severe Hemophilia (A & B)
    • WFH: Strongly recommend individualized prophylaxis to prevent bleeding in patients with severe phenotype hemophilia A or B, including those in resource-limited settings.
      • Prophylaxis is advised to be continued even if lower doses are required due to constraints.
    • ISTH: Recommends prophylaxis over episodic treatment for severe and moderately severe hemophilia A and B, including those with inhibitors.
      • In resource-limited settings, low-dose FVIII prophylaxis is suggested if standard dosing isn’t feasible.

Prophylaxis with Factor VIII Concentrates:

  • WFH: Supports the use of standard or extended half-life FVIII concentrates for prophylaxis.
    • For patients with venous access difficulties, suggests using a central venous access device (CVAD) or emicizumab.
  • ISTH: Recommends prophylaxis with standard or extended half-life FVIII concentrates.
    • For major invasive procedures, continuous or bolus infusion of FVIII concentrates is conditionally suggested. 
    • In resource-limited settings, low-dose FVIII prophylaxis is recommended if standard dosing is not possible.

Prophylaxis with Factor IX Concentrates:

  • WFH: Recommends early initiation of prophylaxis with FVIII or FIX concentrates for pediatric patients and use of extended half-life products to prevent joint disease and bleeding.
  • ISTH: Suggests prophylaxis with purified plasma-derived FIX or standard/extended half-life recombinant FIX concentrates for severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.

Prophylaxis with Emicizumab:

  • WFH: Strongly recommends emicizumab for patients with severe phenotype hemophilia A, especially those with a history of life-threatening bleeds. Emicizumab is also recommended to prevent bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors.
  • ISTH: Conditionally suggests emicizumab for severe hemophilia A with inhibitors over bypassing agents.
    • For severe and moderately severe hemophilia A without inhibitors, emicizumab or FVIII concentrates may be used.

Additional Prophylaxis Considerations:

  • WFH: Emphasizes the importance of adhering to prophylaxis regimens, including escalation if breakthrough bleeding occurs.
    • Also encourage timely and accurate record-keeping by patients and caregivers.
  • ISTH: Provides conditional recommendations for various scenarios, such as starting prophylaxis with plasma-derived FVIII or addressing inhibitors with immune tolerance induction using either low- or high-dose FVIII concentrates.

Comparing hemophilia management recommendations from ISTH and WFH side-by-side highlights the depth and commitment of these leading organizations to improving care for individuals with bleeding disorders and underscores the importance of staying up to date on evidence-based recommendations from leading organizations to advance care for individuals with bleeding disorders. Utilizing these guidelines, healthcare providers are better equipped to deliver targeted, evidence-based care that leverages the latest developments in hemophilia prophylactic management in a way that ensures patient care is optimized and aligned with best practices, ultimately enhancing treatment outcomes and quality of life for individuals with hemophilia!

Make sure to sign up for guideline alerts to stay up to date on all future side-by-side blogs, and let us know if there are specific topics you would like us to compare society recommendations for in upcoming articles!


Copyright © 2024 Guideline Central, All Rights Reserved.