ASRM Mature Oocyte Cryopreservation Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
RECOMMENDATIONS
Document Overview

Mature Oocyte Cryopreservation

American Society for Reproductive Medicine


Publication Date: Jan 1, 2013

Page Last Updated: May 5, 2026


American Society for Reproductive Medicine Quality and Strength of Evidence


Document Overview

Document Title
Mature Oocyte Cryopreservation
Authoring Society

American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Document Publication Date
Jan 1, 2013
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 5, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(12)02247-9/fulltext
Source Citation

Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline
Fertility and Sterility, Volume 99, Issue 1, 37 - 43


Supplemental Implementation Resources


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives
There is good evidence that fertilization and pregnancy rates are similar to IVF/ICSI with fresh oocytes when vitrified/warmed oocytes are used as part of IVF/ICSI for young women. Although data are limited, no increase in chromosomal abnormalities, birth defects, and developmental deficits has been reported in the offspring born from cryopreserved oocytes when compared to pregnancies from conventional IVF/ICSI and the general population. Evidence indicates that oocyte vitrification and warming should no longer be considered experimental. This document replaces the document last published in 2008 titled, “Ovarian Tissue and Oocyte Cryopreservation,” Fertil Steril 2008;90:S241-6.
Scope
Assessment and Screening, Counseling, Management
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D007247 - Infertility, Female

D007246 - Infertility

D059471 - In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques

D054315 - Oocyte Retrieval

D007246 - Infertility

D007247 - Infertility, Female

D059471 - In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques

D054315 - Oocyte Retrieval

Keywords
crylopreservation, infertility
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Laboratory Services, Outpatient
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Number of Source Documents
48
Literature Search End Date
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
No
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
No
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
No
Discloses conflicts of interest?
No
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
No
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.