An Extension Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Patients With Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis (JPsA) and Enthesitis Related Arthritis (ERA)

Recruitment Status
COMPLETED - HAS RESULTS
(See Contacts and Locations)Verified September 2025 by Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Information Provided by (Responsible Party)
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
NCT03769168
Other Study ID Numbers:
CAIN457F2304E1
First Submitted
November 20, 2018
First Posted
December 6, 2018
Results First Posted
May 1, 2025
Last Update Posted
October 15, 2025
Last Verified
September 2025

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on October 2025Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record .

History of Changes

Study Details

Study Description

This study is an extension of a previous core study (NCT03031782 \[CAIN457F2304\]) aiming to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of secukinumab treatment in patients who completed the core study and chose to participate in the extension study. The primary objective was to gather comprehensive data on the efficacy and safety of secukinumab over an extended period.

At Week 104 of the core study, all eligible patients could opt to roll over to the extension study and continue receiving secukinumab at either 75 mg or 150 mg, as they were at the Week 100 visit of the core study. The treatment involved subcutaneous injections using pre-filled syringes (PFS). The duration of patient participation could range from a minimum of one year to a maximum of four years, or until one of the following conditions was met: the drug was locally approved, marketed, and reimbursed, secukinumab could be provided free of charge to patients in compliance with local guidelines, or a maximum of 4 years study duration.

During the extension study (starting from Week 108), to maintain a high proportion of clinically meaningful response during the entire duration of the extension study, the dosing options available, at the Investigator's discretion, were as follows:

* The dose could be escalated from 75 mg to 150 mg for patients whose signs and symptoms were not fully controlled with the current dose of 75 mg and might improve with a higher dose as judged by the investigator

* Further, the dose could be escalated to 300 mg for patients weighing 50 kg and over currently on the 150 mg dose whose signs and symptoms were not fully controlled and might improve further with an increase in dose as judged by the investigator

* Dose escalation from secukinumab 75 mg to 300 mg had to be done in two steps (first 150 mg then 300 mg if the patient weighed 50 kg or over and based on the investigator's judgement), also considering the gap between the two escalations to review the response

Condition or DiseaseIntervention/Treatment
Juvenile Psoriatic ArthritisEnthesitis Related Arthritis
Drug: SecukinumabDrug: Secukinumab

Study Design

Study TypeInterventional
Actual Enrollment55 participants
Design AllocationNon-Randomized
Interventional ModelSingle Group Assignment
MaskingNone (Open Label)
Primary PurposeTreatment
Official TitleAn Extension Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability up to 4 Years in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Subtypes of Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis and Enthesitis Related Arthritis
Study Start DateJune 6, 2019
Actual Primary Completion DateNovember 6, 2024
Actual Study Completion DateNovember 6, 2024

Groups and Cohorts

Group/CohortIntervention/Treatment
Group 1- Secukinumab 75 mg
Participants initially received secukinumab 75mg subcutaneously once every four weeks in the extension study. If the signs and symptoms of the participants were not adequately controlled with the 75mg dose, as determined by the investigator, the dose could be escalated to 150mg subcutaneously. For patients weighing 50kg and over, the dose could further be escalated to 300mg subcutaneously every four weeks. The dose escalation from secukinumab 75mg subcutaneously to 300mg subcutaneously was to be implemented in two steps, with the first step being an increase to 150mg subcutaneously, followed by another escalation to 300mg subcutaneously, based on the judgement of the investigator.
Drug: Secukinumab
Secukinumab solution for subcutaneous injections was provided in PFS. Initially, participants continued to receive secukinumab at either 75 mg (in 0.5mL) or 150 mg (in 1mL) every 4 weeks, consistent with their dosage at the Week 100 visit of the core study. The dose could be escalated from 75 mg to 150 mg for patients whose signs and symptoms were not fully controlled, as judged by the investigator, with the current 75 mg dose. Furthermore, the dose could also be escalated to 300 mg every 4 weeks for patients weighing 50kg and over who were currently on the 150 mg dose and whose signs and symptoms were not well-controlled, as judged by the investigator. The dose escalation from secukinumab 75 mg to 300 mg was to be implemented in two steps (first 150 mg and then 300 mg based on the investigator's judgment). At each study treatment time point, one or two subcutaneous injections in the form of PFS were administered.
Group 2 - Secukinumab 150 mg
Participants initially received secukinumab 150mg subcutaneously once every four weeks in the extension study. If the signs and symptoms of the participants were not adequately controlled with the 150mg dose, as determined by the investigator, the dose could be escalated to 300mg subcutaneously.
Drug: Secukinumab
Secukinumab solution for subcutaneous injections was provided in PFS. Initially, participants continued to receive secukinumab at either 75 mg (in 0.5mL) or 150 mg (in 1mL) every 4 weeks, consistent with their dosage at the Week 100 visit of the core study. The dose could be escalated from 75 mg to 150 mg for patients whose signs and symptoms were not fully controlled, as judged by the investigator, with the current 75 mg dose. Furthermore, the dose could also be escalated to 300 mg every 4 weeks for patients weighing 50kg and over who were currently on the 150 mg dose and whose signs and symptoms were not well-controlled, as judged by the investigator. The dose escalation from secukinumab 75 mg to 300 mg was to be implemented in two steps (first 150 mg and then 300 mg based on the investigator's judgment). At each study treatment time point, one or two subcutaneous injections in the form of PFS were administered.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures
  1. Percentage of Participants With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis American College of Rheumatology (JIA ACR) 30 Response
    The JIA ACR response criteria consisted of 6 core criteria: * Physician global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). * Parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very well and 100=very poor). * Functional ability (CHAQ: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire): 30 questions across 8 domains assessing the child's functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain. It ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). * Number of joints with active arthritis (as per ACR definition), ranging from 0 to 73. * Number of joints with limited range of motion, ranging from 0 to 69. * Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels The JIA ACR 30 response was achieved if 3 of any 6 core set variables improved by at least 30% from baseline of the core study, and no more than 1 variable worsening more than 30%
Secondary Outcome Measures
  1. Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 50 Response
    The JIA ACR response criteria consisted of 6 core criteria: * Physician global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). * Parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very well and 100=very poor). * Functional ability (CHAQ): 30 questions across 8 domains assessing the child's functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain (0 \[no disability\] to 3 \[very severe disability\]). * Number of joints with active arthritis (as per ACR definition), ranging from 0 to 73. * Number of joints with limited range of motion, ranging from 0 to 69. * Index of inflammation: CRP levels The JIA ACR 50 responses were achieved if 3 of any 6 core set variables improved by at least 50% from baseline of the core study, and no more than 1 variable worsening \> 30%
  2. Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 70 Response
    The JIA ACR response criteria consisted of 6 core criteria: * Physician global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). * Parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very well and 100=very poor). * Functional ability (CHAQ): 30 questions across 8 domains assessing the child's functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain (0 \[no disability\] to 3 \[very severe disability\]). * Number of joints with active arthritis (as per ACR definition), ranging from 0 to 73. * Number of joints with limited range of motion, ranging from 0 to 69. * Index of inflammation: CRP levels The JIA ACR 70 responses were achieved if 3 of any 6 core set variables improved by at least 70%, from baseline of the core study, and no more than 1 variable worsening \> 30%
  3. Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 90 Response
    The JIA ACR response criteria consisted of 6 core criteria: * Physician global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). * Parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very well and 100=very poor). * Functional ability (CHAQ): 30 questions across 8 domains assessing the child's functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain (0 \[no disability\] to 3 \[very severe disability\]). * Number of joints with active arthritis (as per ACR definition), ranging from 0 to 73. * Number of joints with limited range of motion, ranging from 0 to 69. * Index of inflammation: CRP levels The JIA ACR 90 responses were achieved if 3 of any 6 core set variables improved by at least 90% from baseline of the core study, and no more than 1 variable worsening \> 30%
  4. Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR 100 Response
    The JIA ACR response criteria consisted of 6 core criteria: * Physician global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). * Parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very well and 100=very poor). * Functional ability (CHAQ): 30 questions across 8 domains assessing the child's functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain (0 \[no disability\] to 3 \[very severe disability\]). * Number of joints with active arthritis (as per ACR definition), ranging from 0 to 73. * Number of joints with limited range of motion, ranging from 0 to 69. * Index of inflammation: CRP levels The JIA ACR 100 responses were achieved if 3 of any 6 core set variables improved with 100% from baseline of the core study, and no more than 1 variable worsening \> 30%
  5. Number of Participants With Inactive Disease Status
    Inactive disease status was confirmed in a patient when all the following conditions were met: * No joints with active arthritis * No uveitis * CRP value within normal limits for the laboratory where tested or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA * Physician's global assessment of disease activity score ≤ 10mm * Duration of morning stiffness attributable to JIA lasting ≥15 minutes.
  6. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in JIA ACR Core Component - Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity
    The JIA ACR response criteria consisted of 6 core criteria, one of which was the physician global assessment of disease activity. this assessment was conducted using a 100 mm VAS score, where 0 represented the best disease activity and 100 the worst. The change from baseline of the core study of the physician global assessment of disease activity was measured, with a negative change indicating improvement.
  7. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in JIA ACR Core Component - Parent's or Patients' Global Assessment of Overall Well-being
    The JIA ACR response criteria included six core components, one of which was the parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being. This assessment was conducted using a 100 mm VAS score, where 0 represented "very well" and 100 "very poor". The change from baseline of the core study in the parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being was measured, with a negative change indicating improvement
  8. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in JIA ACR Core Component - Functional Ability (CHAQ)
    The JIA ACR response criteria included six core components, one of which was the functional ability, measured by the CHAQ. The CHAQ questionnaire consisted of 30 questions across 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each domain was scored on a 4-point scale, and the total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain. The total score ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). The change from baseline of the core study in the CHAQ was measured, with a negative change indicating improvement.
  9. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in JIA ACR Core Component - Number of Joints With Active Arthritis
    The JIA ACR response criteria included six core components, one of which was the number of joints with active arthritis. This was determined using the ACR definition, which identifies active arthritis as any joint with swelling or, in the absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness not due to deformity. The active joint count ranged from 0 to 73. The change from baseline of the core study in the number of active joints was measured, with a negative change indicating improvement.
  10. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in JIA ACR Core Component - Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion
    The JIA ACR response criteria included six core components, one of which was the number of joints with limited range of motion. A total of 69 joints were assessed for limitation of motion. The change from baseline of the core study in the number of joints with limited range of motion was measured, with a negative change indicating improvement.
  11. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in JIA ACR Core Component - CRP Levels
    The JIA ACR response criteria included six core components, one of which was CRP levels, an inflammation biomarker. Serum concentrations of CRP were determined, and the change from baseline of the core study was assessed, with negative changes indicating improvement.
  12. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 of 27-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27)
    The JADAS-27 was used for assessment of disease activity, and it included 4 measures: * Physician global assessment of disease activity (VAS range: 0 to 10; where 0=very good and 100=very poor) * Parent/participant global assessment of well-being (VAS range: 0 to 10; 0=very well and 100=very poor) * Count of joints with active disease (range: 0 to 27; where 0= no disease activity and 27= maximum disease activity) * Index of inflammation determined by CRP concentration, calculated as: (CRP (mg/l) -10)/10. Before calculation, CRP values \<10 mg/l were converted to 10 and CRP values \>110 mg/l were converted to 110. The normalized scale ranged from 0 to 10; where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximum disease activity. JADAS-27 score was calculated as the sum of the score of its 4 components, ranging from 0 to 57 where 0= no disease activity and 57= maximum disease activity. The change from baseline of the core study was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
  13. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 of 71-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-71)
    The JADAS-27 was used for assessment of disease activity, and it included 4 measures: * Physician global assessment of disease activity (VAS range: 0 to 10; where 0=very good and 100=very poor) * Parent/participant global assessment of well-being (VAS range: 0 to 10; 0=very well and 100=very poor) * Count of joints with active disease (range: 0 to 71; where 0= no disease activity and 71= maximum disease activity) * Index of inflammation determined by CRP concentration, calculated as: (CRP (mg/l) -10)/10. Before calculation, CRP values \<10 mg/l were converted to 10 and CRP values \>110 mg/l were converted to 110. The normalized scale ranged from 0 to 10; where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximum disease activity. JADAS-27 score was calculated as the sum of the score of its 4 components, ranging from 0 to 101 where 0= no disease activity and 101= maximum disease activity. The change from baseline of the core study was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
  14. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in Total Enthesitis Count
    The following 16 entheseal sites were assessed for the presence or absence of tenderness (enthesitis) on each side of the body: * Anterior Entheses: Greater trochanter of the Femur; Medial condyle of the femur; Lateral condyle of the femur * Posterior Entheses: Greater tuberosity of humerus; medial epicondyle of humerus; lateral epicondyle of humerus, Achilles tendon; and calcaneal insertion of the plantar fascia. Tenderness on examination was recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, The total enthesitis count ranged from 0 to 16. The change from baseline of the core study was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement
  15. Change From Baseline of Core Study CAIN457F2304 in Total Dactylitis Count
    The dactylitis count was the number of fingers and toes presenting with swelling and inflammation. Swelling and inflammation on examination was recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 20 sites, The total dactylitis count ranged from 0 to 20. The change from baseline of the core study was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement
  16. Serum Concentrations of Secukinumab Over Time
    Serum concentration of secukinumab over time. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics were taken pre-dose at the scheduled time points.
  17. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) of Secukinumab
    Number of participants with treatment-emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) of secukinumab. Blood samples were collected for immunogenicity (anti-AIN457 antibodies) assessments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for StudyAll
Accepts Healthy VolunteersNo
Inclusion Criteria
Patients had to have participated in the core study CAIN457F2304 and completed the entire treatment period up to and including Week 104.
Patients had to be deemed by the investigator to benefit from continued secukinumab therapy. Key
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with plans for administration of live vaccines during the extension study period were excluded.
Patients taking any other concomitant biologic immunomodulating agent(s) except secukinumab were excluded.
Patients who were deemed not to be benefiting from the study treatment based on lack of improvement or worsening of their symptoms were excluded.

Contacts and Locations

Sponsors and CollaboratorsNovartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
St Lukes Intermountain Research Center | Boise Idaho, United States, 83702Cincinnati Childrens Hospital | Cincinnati Ohio, United States, 45229Legacy Emanuel Research Hospital Portland | Portland Oregon, United States, 97232Novartis Investigative Site | Brussels , Belgium, 1200Novartis Investigative Site | Ghent , Belgium, 9000Novartis Investigative Site | Freiburg im Breisgau , Germany, 79106Novartis Investigative Site | Hamburg , Germany, 22081Novartis Investigative Site | Saint Augustin , Germany, 53757Novartis Investigative Site | Genova GE, Italy, 16147Novartis Investigative Site | Naples , Italy, 80131Novartis Investigative Site | Krakow , Poland, 31503Novartis Investigative Site | Moscow , Russia, 119991Novartis Investigative Site | Saint Petersburg , Russia, 194100Novartis Investigative Site | Voronezh , Russia, 394036Novartis Investigative Site | Yekaterinburg , Russia, 620149Novartis Investigative Site | Panorama Western Cape, South Africa, 7500Novartis Investigative Site | Cape Town , South Africa, 7925Novartis Investigative Site | Santiago de Compostela Galicia, Spain, 15706Novartis Investigative Site | Valencia , Spain, 46026Novartis Investigative Site | Istanbul Halkali, Turkey (Türkiye), 34303Novartis Investigative Site | Istanbul TUR, Turkey (Türkiye), 34098Novartis Investigative Site | Ankara , Turkey (Türkiye), 06230Novartis Investigative Site | Istanbul , Turkey (Türkiye), 34093
Investigators
Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Documents (Full Text)
Documents provided by Novartis PharmaceuticalsStudy Protocol  November 11, 2018Documents provided by Novartis PharmaceuticalsStatistical Analysis Plan  November 4, 2024