A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Plaque Psoriasis Involving Special Areas (Scalp, Genital, and/or Palms of the Hands and the Soles of the Feet)

Recruitment Status
ACTIVE, NOT RECRUITING - HAS RESULTS
(See Contacts and Locations)Verified June 2026 by Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Information Provided by (Responsible Party)
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
NCT06095102
Other Study ID Numbers:
77242113PSO3003
First Submitted
October 17, 2023
First Posted
October 22, 2023
Results First Posted
April 14, 2026
Last Update Posted
July 5, 2026
Last Verified
June 2026

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on July 2026Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record .

History of Changes

Study Details

Study Description

Condition or DiseaseIntervention/Treatment
Plaque Psoriasis
Drug: JNJ-77242113Drug: JNJ-77242113

Study Design

Study TypeInterventional
Actual Enrollment311 participants
Design AllocationRandomized
Interventional ModelParallel Assignment
MaskingDouble
Primary PurposeTreatment
Official TitleA Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Plaque Psoriasis Involving Special Areas
Study Start DateOctober 11, 2023
Actual Primary Completion DateJune 18, 2024
Actual Study Completion Date7mos 5d from now

Groups and Cohorts

Group/CohortIntervention/Treatment
JNJ-77242113
Participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156.
Drug: JNJ-77242113
JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.
Placebo
Participants will receive placebo from Week 0 through Week 16 and thereafter will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
Drug: JNJ-77242113
JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema, scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration:0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,\>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Secondary Outcome Measures
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3
    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3
    PSSI 90 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved at least 90% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (\<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total score ranging from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA Score >=3
    The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3
    The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) among participants. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, \>1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3 and a Baseline GenPs-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2
    The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date. Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis.
  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3 and a Baseline Scalp Itch NRS Score >=4
    The Scalp Itch NRS is a single item instrument that evaluates the severity of scalp itch in adult and adolescent populations over the past 24 hours. The instrument uses an NRS score ranging from 0 (no scalp itch) to 10 (worst scalp itch imaginable), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in Genital Psoriasis Symptoms Score (GPSS) Genital Itch NRS Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3 and a Baseline GPSS Genital Itch NRS Score >=4
    The GPSS is a participant-administered assessment of 8 symptoms: itch, pain, discomfort, stinging, burning, redness, scaling, and cracking. Each respondent is asked to answer the questions based on the psoriasis symptoms in his or her genital area. The overall severity for each individual genital psoriasis symptom is indicated by selecting the number from an NRS of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom in the genital area in the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (no severity) to 10 (worst imaginable severity). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at Week 16
    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (\>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Week 16
    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (\>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  13. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
    Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  14. Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
    Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  15. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  16. Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
    Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported. The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features. The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1 = onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2 = pitting, and 3 = nail plate crumbling. Next four features was each scored 0 absent or 1 present, and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula. Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  17. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (fPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
    Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  18. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score of 0 at Week 8 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  19. Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptoms Score at Week 16
    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  20. Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 4 Among Participants With a Baseline Itch Score >=4
    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
  21. Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
    Change from baseline in PSSD sign score at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  22. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Sign Score >0
    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  23. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
    The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  24. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Children's Dermatological Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Adolescent Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score >1
    The CDLQI was an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and was utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. The instrument is designed for use in children, is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  25. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.
  26. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16
    The PROMIS-25 was utilized in the adolescent population and is a 25-item generic HRQoL survey. Six PROMIS domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference) are each assessed with 4 questions. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Higher score=worst pain. Raw scores for each domain were converted to T-scores using standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 with an observed range 20 to 80. For anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and pain interference, a negative change indicates an improvement while for physical function mobility and peer relationships, a positive change indicates an improvement. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  27. Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Quality of Life Instrument (ppQLI) Hands Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3
    The ppQLI assesses impact on patient quality of life due to palmoplantar psoriasis over the past month in adult and adolescent populations. Sixteen items evaluate hand functionality, pain, and social impact due to psoriasis. Fourteen items evaluate foot functionality, pain, and physical limitations due to psoriasis. All items use verbal rating scales ranging from 1 to 5. The ppQLI yields a score for hands, ranging from 16 to 80, and a score for feet, ranging from 14 to 70. Higher score indicating more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  28. Change From Baseline in ppQLI Feet Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3
    The ppQLI assesses impact on patient quality of life due to palmoplantar psoriasis over the past month in adult and adolescent populations. Sixteen items evaluate hand functionality, pain, and social impact due to psoriasis. Fourteen items evaluate foot functionality, pain, and physical limitations due to psoriasis. All items use verbal rating scales ranging from 1 to 5. The ppQLI yields a score for hands, ranging from 16 to 80, and a score for feet, ranging from 14 to 70. Higher score indicating more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  29. Change From Baseline in Genital Psoriasis Symptoms Score (GPSS) Total Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
    The GPSS was a participant-administered assessment of 8 symptoms: itch, pain, discomfort, stinging, burning, redness, scaling, and cracking. Each respondent was asked to answer the questions based on the psoriasis symptoms in his or her genital area. The overall severity for each individual genital psoriasis symptom was indicated by selecting the number from an NRS of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom in the genital area in the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (no severity) to 10 (worst imaginable severity). Results from each symptom assessment were summed to generate a total GPSS score ranging from 0 (no genital psoriasis symptoms) to 80 (worst imaginable genital psoriasis symptoms). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in genital psoriasis symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
  30. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
  31. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for StudyAll
Accepts Healthy VolunteersNo
Inclusion Criteria
Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
Need to meet criteria: Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (\>=)1 percent (%) at screening and baseline, and investigator global assessment (IGA) (overall) \>=2 at screening and baseline and at least one of the following: scalp-specific investigator global assessment (ss-IGA) score \>=3 at screening and baseline, and/or static physician's global assessment of genitalia (sPGA-G) \>=3 at screening and baseline, and/or physician's global assessment of hands and feet (hf-PGA) score \>=3 at screening and baseline
Failed to respond to at least 1 topical therapy (example, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and/or vitamin D analogs) used for treatment of psoriasis
Confirmation of plaque psoriasis in a non-special area (example, areas excluding scalp, genital, palmoplantar) at screening and baseline
Exclusion Criteria
Nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
Dermatoses other than plaque psoriasis (such as contact dermatitis) or palmoplantar pustulosis of the palmoplantar area (if hf-PGA \>=3 at baseline)
Current drug-induced psoriasis (example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113 or its excipients

Contacts and Locations

Sponsors and CollaboratorsJanssen Research & Development, LLC
Locations
Center for Dermatology and Plastic Surgery | Scottsdale Arizona, United States, 85260Johnson Dermatology | Fort Smith Arkansas, United States, 72916California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute | Encinitas California, United States, 92024Forcare Clinical Research Inc | Tampa Florida, United States, 33613Hamilton Research LLC | Alpharetta Georgia, United States, 30022Arlington Dermatology | Rolling Meadows Illinois, United States, 60008Dundee Dermatology | West Dundee Illinois, United States, 60118Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC | Indianapolis Indiana, United States, 46250Indiana Clinical Trial Center | Plainfield Indiana, United States, 46168Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics | Lake Charles Louisiana, United States, 70605Allcutis Research 1 | Beverly Massachusetts, United States, 01915Hamzavi Dermatology | Fort Gratiot Michigan, United States, 48059Minnesota Clinical Study Center | New Brighton Minnesota, United States, 55112MediSearch Clinical Trials | Saint Joseph Missouri, United States, 64506Skin Specialists | Omaha Nebraska, United States, 68144Schweiger Dermatology Group | East Windsor New Jersey, United States, 08520Optima Research | Boardman Ohio, United States, 44512Oregon Dermatology and Research Center | Portland Oregon, United States, 97210Paddington Testing Co, Inc. | Philadelphia Pennsylvania, United States, 19103University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, United States, 15213Arlington Research Center, Inc. | Arlington Texas, United States, 76011Center for Clinical Studies 1 | Houston Texas, United States, 77004Austin Institute for Clinical Research | Pflugerville Texas, United States, 78660Progressive Clinical Research | San Antonio Texas, United States, 78213Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio | San Antonio Texas, United States, 78229Center for Clinical Studies | Webster Texas, United States, 77598Cope Family Medicine - Ogden Clinic | Bountiful Utah, United States, 84010Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC | Mill Creek Washington, United States, 98012CIPREC | Buenos Aires , Argentina, C1061AASCentro Privado de Medicina Familiar | Buenos Aires , Argentina, C1417EYGConexa Investigacion Clinica S.A. | CABA , Argentina, C1012AAYCEDIC Centro de Investigacion clinica | Caba , Argentina, C1060ABNAlberta DermaSurgery Centre | Edmonton Alberta, Canada, T6G 1C3Lynderm Research Inc. | Markham Ontario, Canada, L3P 1X3Skin Centre for Dermatology | Peterborough Ontario, Canada, K9J 5K2York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre | Richmond Hill Ontario, Canada, L4B1L1Innovaderm Research Inc. | Montreal Quebec, Canada, H2X 2V1Centre Dermatologique | Québec Quebec, Canada, G1V 4X7Skinsense Medical Research | Saskatoon Saskatchewan, Canada, S7K 2C1ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH | Berlin , Germany, 10789CRS Clinical Research Services Berlin GmbH | Berlin , Germany, 13627Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR | Bochum , Germany, 44793Rosenpark Research GmbH | Darmstadt , Germany, 64283Medizinische Fakultaet Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universitaet Dresden | Dresden , Germany, 01307Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt | Frankfurt am Main , Germany, 60590Dermatologikum Hamburg Gmbh | Hamburg , Germany, 20354Klinische Forschung Schwerin GmbH | Schwerin , Germany, 19055Hautarztpraxis 2 | Witten , Germany, 58453Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem | Borgyogyaszati Klinika , Hungary, 7632Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft | Budapest , Hungary, 1036Derma-B Kft | Debrecen , Hungary, 4031SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika | Szeged , Hungary, 6720Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft. | Szolnok , Hungary, 5000Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt. | Veszprém , Hungary, 8200Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik | Bialystok , Poland, 15-351Specderm Poznanska sp j | Bialystok , Poland, 15-375Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o | Krakow , Poland, 30 438Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna | Krakow , Poland, 30-002Centrum Medyczne Promed | Krakow , Poland, 31-411Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o | Lodz , Poland, 90-265Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C | Osielsko , Poland, 86031SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne | Poznan , Poland, 60 529Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k | Poznan , Poland, 61 731Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna | Warsaw , Poland, 01 817Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia | Warsaw , Poland, 02 953Wro Medica | Wroclaw , Poland, 51 685Centrum Medyczne Oporow | Wroclaw , Poland, 52 416Pusan National University Hospital | Busan , South Korea, 49241Seoul National University Bundang Hospital | Seongnam-si , South Korea, 13620Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul , South Korea, 03080Konkuk University Medical Center | Seoul , South Korea, 05030Korea University Guro Hospital | Seoul , South Korea, 08308Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol | Badalona , Spain, 08916Hosp. Del Mar | Barcelona , Spain, 08003Hosp. Sant Joan de Deu | Esplugues de Llobregat , Spain, 08950Hosp. Univ. San Cecilio | Granada , Spain, 18016Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre | Madrid , Spain, 28041Hosp. de Manises | Manises , Spain, 46940Hosp. Virgen Macarena | Seville , Spain, 41009Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe | Valencia , Spain, 46026National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch | Hsinchu , Taiwan, 30059Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Kaohsiung City , Taiwan, 83301National Taiwan University Hospital | Taipei , Taiwan, 10048Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Taoyuan , Taiwan, 33382Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty | Konya , Turkey (Türkiye), 42080Ondokuz Mayis University | Samsun , Turkey (Türkiye), 55270Karadeniz Teknik University Medical Faculty | Trabzon , Turkey (Türkiye), 61080London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust | Harrow , United Kingdom, HA1 3UJSalford Royal Hospital | Salford , United Kingdom, M6 8HDUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust | Southampton , United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
Investigators
Study Director: Janssen Research &Development, LLC Clinical trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Documents (Full Text)
Documents provided by Janssen Research & Development, LLCStudy Protocol  October 30, 2023Documents provided by Janssen Research & Development, LLCStatistical Analysis Plan  July 29, 2024