ACG Helicobacter pylori Infection Clinical Guideline Summary 2024 - Guideline Central
Summary of Recommendations
Document Overview

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

American College of Gastroenterology


Publication Date: Sep 4, 2024

Page Last Updated: May 5, 2026


Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-Based Recommendations

Source: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (Schunemann HJ et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:605-14. Guyatt GH et al. BMJ 2008;336:924-6).


Document Overview

Document Title
Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection
Authoring Society

American College of Gastroenterology

Document Publication Date
Sep 4, 2024
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 5, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
journals.lww.com/ajg/fulltext/2024/09000/acg_clinical_guideline__treatment_of_helicobacter.13.aspx?context=featuredarticles&collectionid=5
Source Citation

Chey, William D. MD, FACG1; Howden, Colin W. MD, FACG2; Moss, Steven F. MD, FACG3; Morgan, Douglas R. MD, MPH, FACG4; Greer, Katarina B. MD, MSEpi5; Grover, Shilpa MD, MPH6; Shah, Shailja C. MD, MPH7. ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 119(9):p 1730-1753, September 2024. | DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002968


Supplemental Implementation Resources


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives

Helicobacter pylori is a prevalent, global infectious disease that causes dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer. The American College of Gastroenterology commissioned this clinical practice guideline (CPG) to inform the evidence-based management of patients with H. pylori infection in North America. This CPG used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to systematically analyze 11 Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions and generate recommendations. Where evidence was insufficient or the topic did not lend itself to GRADE, expert consensus was used to create 6 key concepts. For treatment-naive patients with H. pylori infection, bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for 14 days is the preferred regimen when antibiotic susceptibility is unknown. Rifabutin triple therapy or potassium-competitive acid blocker dual therapy for 14 days is a suitable empiric alternative in patients without penicillin allergy. In treatment-experienced patients with persistent H. pylori infection, “optimized” BQT for 14 days is preferred for those who have not been treated with optimized BQT previously and for whom antibiotic susceptibility is unknown. In patients previously treated with optimized BQT, rifabutin triple therapy for 14 days is a suitable empiric alternative. Salvage regimens containing clarithromycin or levofloxacin should only be used if antibiotic susceptibility is confirmed. The CPG also addresses who to test, the need for universal post-treatment test-of-cure, and the current evidence regarding antibiotic susceptibility testing and its role in guiding the choice of initial and salvage treatment. The CPG concludes with a discussion of proposed research priorities to address knowledge gaps and inform future management recommendations in patients with H. pylori infection from North America.

Scope
Assessment and Screening, Diagnosis, Management, Prevention, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D019072 - Antibiotic Prophylaxis

D016998 - Helicobacter

D041981 - Gastrointestinal Tract

D016480 - Helicobacter pylori

D019072 - Antibiotic Prophylaxis

D016998 - Helicobacter

D041981 - Gastrointestinal Tract

D016480 - Helicobacter pylori

Keywords
H.pylori, Helicobacter pylori, dyspepsia, gastrointestinal, infection
Target Patient Population
Patients with H. Pylori infection
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adolescent, Adult, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Hospital, Long Term Care, Outpatient
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Supplemental Methodology Resources
Data Supplement Data Supplement
Number of Source Documents
136
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
No
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
Yes
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
Yes
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
Yes
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.