Summary of Consensus Recommendations

Document Overview

Design and created by Guideline Central in participation with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Treatment of Urogenital Symptoms in Individuals With a History of Estrogen-dependent Breast Cancer

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Publication Date: Dec 1, 2021

Page Last Updated: May 5, 2026

View External Table

Document Overview

Document Title: Treatment of Urogenital Symptoms in Individuals With a History of Estrogen-dependent Breast Cancer

Authoring Society: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Document Publication Date: Dec 1, 2021

Page Last Reviewed/Updated: May 5, 2026

Document Type: Consensus

Country of Publication: United States

Full Text Freely Available: Yes

Full Text Guideline: www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/clinical-consensus/articles/2021/12/treatment-of-urogenital-symptoms-in-individuals-with-a-history-of-estrogen-dependent-breast-cancer

Source Citation: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Clinical Consensus—Gynecology. Treatment of Urogenital Symptoms in Individuals With a History of Estrogen-dependent Breast Cancer: Clinical Consensus. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 1;138(6):950-960. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004601. PMID: 34794166.

Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Scope: Management, Treatment

Keywords: breast cancer, estrogen, urogenital symptoms

Inclusion Criteria: Female, Adult, Older Adult

Health Care Settings: Ambulatory

Intended Users: Nurse, Nurse Midwife, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Supplemental Methodology Resources: Evidence Tables Data Supplement

Number of Source Documents: 86

Literature Search End Date: Sunday, June 6, 2021

Includes peer/external review process?: Yes

Includes public comment process?: No

Methodologist involvement?: Yes

Patient involvement?: No

Includes multi-disciplinary group?: Yes

Includes systematic review?: Yes

Grades quality of strength of evidence?: No

Grades quality of strength of recommendation?: No

Discloses funding source?: No

Discloses conflicts of interest?: Yes

Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?: No