SFP Rh Testing in Early Pregnancy Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Recommendations
Document Overview

Rh Testing in Early Pregnancy

Society of Family Planning


Publication Date: Jul 20, 2022

Page Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026



Document Overview

Document Title
Rh Testing in Early Pregnancy
Authoring Society

Society of Family Planning

Document Publication Date
Jul 20, 2022
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
Mar 23, 2026
Document Type
Consensus
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(22)00197-4/fulltext
Source Citation

Horvath S, Goyal V, Traxler S, Prager S. Society of Family Planning committee consensus on Rh testing in early pregnancy. Contraception. 2022 Jul 21:S0010-7824(22)00197-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.002. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35872236.


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives
Historical evidence that fetal red blood cell (RBC) exposure during early spontaneous or induced abortion can cause maternal Rh sensitization is limited. A close reading of these studies indicates that forgoing Rh immunoglobulin administration before 12-weeks gestation is highly unlikely to increase risk of Rh (D) antibody development, and recent studies indicate that fetal RBC exposure during aspiration abortion <12 weeks gestation is below the calculated threshold to cause maternal Rh sensitization, and the amount of fetomaternal hemorrhage during dilation and evacuation procedures up to 18-weeks gestation is adequately treated with 100-mcg of Rh immunoglobulin. We provide updated recommendations for Rh immunoglobulin administration based on this new evidence.
Scope
Assessment and Screening, Counseling
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D011247 - Pregnancy

D012234 - Rho Factor

Keywords
Pregnancy care, pregnancy, rh testing
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Hospital, Laboratory Services, Outpatient
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Number of Source Documents
25
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
No
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
No
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
No
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
No
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
No
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.