IDSA Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Diagnosis
Treatment
Document Overview

Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis

Infectious Diseases Society of America


Publication Date: Sep 9, 2012

Page Last Updated: May 5, 2026


Grading Table

For the complete GRADE Strength of Recommendations and Quality of the Evidence Table, visit the IDSA website: http://www.idsociety.org/Guidelines_Other/


Document Overview

Document Title
Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis
Authoring Society

Infectious Diseases Society of America

Document Publication Date
Sep 9, 2012
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 5, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
academic.oup.com/cid/article/55/10/e86/321183?searchresult=1
Source Citation

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management Of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: 2012 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Shulman ST, Bisno AL, Clegg HW, Gerber MA, Kaplan EL, Lee G, Martin JM, Van Beneden C.


Supplemental Implementation Resources


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives

Group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is a significant cause of community-associated infections. This document constitutes a revision of the 2002 guideline of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) on the treatment of GAS pharyngitis. The primary objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations on the management of this very common clinical condition among adult and pediatric patients. The guideline addresses issues related to the diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis and its treatment in patients who are or are not allergic to penicillin. The guideline does not discuss active surveillance testing or other prevention strategies. Each section of the guideline begins with a specific clinical question and is followed by numbered recommendations and a summary of the most-relevant evidence in support of the recommendations. Areas of controversy in which data are limited or conflicting and in which additional research is needed are indicated throughout the document and are highlighted in the Future Research section.

Scope
Diagnosis, Management, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D010612 - Pharyngitis

D013290 - Streptococcal Infections

D010612 - Pharyngitis

D013290 - Streptococcal Infections

Keywords
pharyngitis, pharyngotonsillitis, sore throat, streptococcal
Target Patient Population
adult and pediatric patients with group A streptococcal (GAS)
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Infant, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

PICO Questions
  1. How should the diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis be established?
  2. Who should undergo testing for GAS pharyngitis?
  3. What are the treatment recommendations for patients with a diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis?
  4. Should adjunctive therapy with NSAIDs, acetaminophen, aspirin, or corticosteroids be given to patients with a diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis?
  5. Is the patient with frequent recurrent episodes of apparent GAS pharyngitis likely to be a chronic pharyngeal carrier of GAS?
Number of Source Documents
134
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
No
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
Yes
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
Yes
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
No
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.