NBDF Administration of Vaccines to Individuals with Bleeding Disorders Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Protocol for Administration of Vaccines
Vaccines that can be given subcutaneously
Additional Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines
Document Overview

Administration of Vaccines to Individuals with Bleeding Disorders

National Bleeding Disorders Foundation


Publication Date: May 1, 2023

Page Last Updated: May 5, 2026



Document Overview

Document Title
Administration of Vaccines to Individuals with Bleeding Disorders
Authoring Society

National Bleeding Disorders Foundation

Document Publication Date
May 1, 2023
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 5, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.hemophilia.org/healthcare-professionals/guidelines-on-care/masac-documents/masac-document-278-masac-recommendations-on-administration-of-vaccines-to-individuals-with-bleeding-disorders

Supplemental Implementation Resources


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives

There has been considerable discussion in the hemophilia community regarding the optimal protocol for the administration of vaccines to individuals with bleeding disorders. Speculation that vaccines may induce the development of inhibitors to factor concentrates are not substantiated1. The MASAC Vaccine Working Group has reviewed the available literature, online and in print, and has developed the following recommendations.

Scope
Counseling, Management, Prevention
Keywords
bleeding disorders, vaccines
Target Patient Population
Individuals with bleeding disorders
Target Provider Population
Family practitioners, hematologists and other bleeding disorders specialists
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Number of Source Documents
12
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
No
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
No
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
No
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
No
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
No
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.