ASH Treating Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Document Overview

Document Overview

Document Title
Treating Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults
Authoring Society

American Society of Hematology

Document Publication Date
Nov 25, 2025
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
Jun 2, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/article/doi/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017934/548455/American-Society-of-Hematology-2025-guidelines-for
Source Citation

Sekeres MA, Mattison RJ, Artz AS, Baer MR, Chua CC, Demichelis-Gomez R, Egan PC, Fletcher L, Foucar CE, Garcia JS, Gilberto L, Gómez-De León A, Lancet JE, Loh KP, Malcovati L, Marini BL, Platzbecker U, Sorror ML, Tinsley-Vance S, Treitz J, Oliveros MJ, Ibrahim S, Roldan Y, Guyatt GH, Brignardello-Petersen R. American Society of Hematology 2025 guidelines for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older adults. Blood Adv. 2025 Nov 25:bloodadvances.2025017934. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017934. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41321225.


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives

Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represent a cancer population in whom disease-based risk factors, comorbidities, patient goals, and treatment risks and benefits influence treatment recommendations. These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians and other health professionals in their decisions about management of AML in older adults. ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel, including patient representatives, that minimized bias from conflicts of interest. Clarity Research Group at McMaster University supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel agreed on 9 critical clinical recommendations for managing AML in older adults, mirroring real-time practitioner-patient conversations: the decision to pursue antileukemic treatment vs. best supportive management; traditional induction and post-remission therapy vs. hypomethylating agent or low-dose cytarabine, or combinations with venetoclax; the role and duration of post-remission therapy; combinations with venetoclax vs. monotherapy; the use of targeted therapy, including IDH and FLT3 inhibitors, in appropriate patients; the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-favorable prognosis AML; and the role of transfusion support for patients no longer receiving antileukemic therapy. Key recommendations of these guidelines include treatment over best supportive care; venetoclax-based regimens over monotherapies; and incorporation of FLT3 inhibitors into traditional induction and post-remission therapy.

Scope
Management, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D007938 - Leukemia

D015470 - Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

D007951 - Leukemia, Myeloid

Keywords
AML, acute leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, leukemia
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Hospital, Outpatient
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Number of Source Documents
150
Literature Search Start Date
Tuesday, January 1, 2019
Literature Search End Date
Friday, November 1, 2024
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
Yes
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
Yes
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
Yes
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
Yes
Identifies study selection process?
Yes
Identifies study selection criteria?
Yes
Identifies methods used to evaluate and analyze the evidence?
Yes
Identifies key questions addressed by the systematic review?
Yes
Identifies search strategy?
Yes
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.