Design and created by Guideline Central in participation with the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry and American Society of Addiction Medicine.

American Society of Addiction Medicine
American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry
Publication Date: April 23, 2024
| Drug | Dose | SUD |
|---|---|---|
| Modafinil | 100–400 mg/day (or 200 mg BID) | Cocaine |
| Modafinil | 400 mg/day | Cocaine, ATS |
| Topiramate + MAS-ER | Topiramate max 100–150 mg BID + MAS-ER max 60 mg/day | Cocaine |
| MAS-ER | 60–80 mg/day | Cocaine |
| Dextroamphetamine (d-AMP-SR) | 20–60 mg/day | Cocaine |
| Methylphenidate ER | 54–72 mg/day | ATS |
| Methylphenidate SR | 20–40 mg BID | Cocaine |
| Methylphenidate SR | 54 mg/day | ATS |
| Methylphenidate short acting | 20–60 mg/day (Mean 37.6 mg/dayb) | ATS |
| Methylphenidate | 5–10 mg/day | ATS |
| Agent/Class | Mechanism | Example dosing | Indications | Other considerations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sedatives | Benzodiazepines (BZDs) (first line) | GABAergic | Initial dosing: Lorazepam 1–2 mg intravenous (IV) based on clinical signs and symptoms and duration of effects Diazepam 5–10 mg per os (by mouth/oral) (PO) for less severe symptoms based on patient parameters Midazolam 5 mg intramuscular (IM) or 0.01–0.05 mg/kg IV for acute agitation in adult patients Redosing frequency and dose should be guided by the degree and duration of the clinical effects of the initial dose | Excitatory symptoms Anxiety/ Agitation Neuromuscular excitation Seizures | Parenteral vs. PO administration based on signs and symptom severity and drug availability (eg, parenteral BZD shortages). IM administration allows for administration in agitated patients without IV access. Lorazepam has very slow IM onset (15–30 min) Midazolam has very rapid IV onset, allowing for easy titration, and a relatively fast IM onset If psychosis is primary symptom, antipsychotics should be considered primarily or adjunctively |
| Sedatives | Phenobarbital (PBO) | GABAergic | Incremental 130–260 mg IM/IV/PO based on symptoms and patient parametersLoading strategy (eg, 5–10 mg/kg)Titrate based on clinical effects | BZD shortages or contraindications Patient not responding to escalating doses of BZDs Severe sympathomimetic intoxication | High oral bioavailability; PO dosing can be similar to parenteral dosing Onset of effects, while slower than IV, is still fairly quick compared to other PO medications |
| Sedatives | Propofol | GABAergic + N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism | 10–50 μg/kg/min based on symptoms and patient parameters | For critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) Severe sympathomimetic intoxication not responding to other agents | Patients can be administered BZDs, PBO, and/or propofol concomitantly Intubation is almost always required for propofol administration |
| Sympatholytics | Clonidine | Alpha-2 agonism +/– other | 0.1–0.2 mg PO every 4 hours as needed | Anxiety | Useful medication adjunct to BZDs Maintain hydration to avoid orthostatic symptoms |
| Sympatholytics | Dexmedetomidine | Alpha-2 agonism | Start at 0.2–0.4 μg/kg/hr and titrate every 30 min up to maximum of 1.5 μg/kg/hr | For critically ill patients in the ED or ICU as primary or secondary medication for sedation | Useful medication adjunct to BZDs or other sedation agents Onset of effects generally 30–60 min Sedation without impairments in ventilation |
| Antipsychotics | Butyrophenones (2nd gen) | Dopamine antagonism | Haloperidol or droperidol 5 mg IM | Acute agitation with psychosis Agitation not responding to BZDs Toxic psychosis | Consider atypical or newer generation antipsychotics as alternatives Consider risk of QT prolongation |
| Antipsychotics | Atypical | Dopamine antagonism +/– other | Olanzapine 5 mg PO Quetiapine 50–100 mg PO at night | Anxiety or agitation with psychotic features Stimulant-induced psychosis Stimulant-induced sleep derangements | Consider risk of QT prolongation For olanzapine, degree of symptoms to balance need for PO vs. IM |
| Other | Ketamine | NMDA receptor antagonism | 1–5 mg/kg IM depending on degree of agitation | For severe agitation as primary or secondary agent | Rapid IM onset of action compared to other agents |
| Implications for: | Strong Recommendation (S) | Conditional Recommendation (C) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course of action, and only a small proportion would not. | The majority of individuals in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not. |
| Clinicians | Most individuals should receive the intervention. Adherence to this recommendation according to the guideline could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator. Formal decision aids are not likely to be needed to help individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences. | Recognize that different choices will be appropriate for individual patients and that you must help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with his or her values and preferences. Decision aids may be useful in helping individuals to make decisions consistent with their values and preferences. |
| Policy | The recommendation can be adopted as policy in most situations. | Policymaking will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders. |
| Certainty in the Evidence | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| High | H | Low | L |
| Moderate | M | Very Low | VL |
Source: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (Schunemann HJ et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:605-14. Guyatt GH et al. BMJ 2008;336:924-6).
Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members; ASAM Team; AAAP Team; IRETA Team. The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder. J Addict Med. 2024 May-Jun 01;18(1S Suppl 1):1-56. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001299. PMID: 38669101; PMCID: PMC11105801.
Guideline Committee Members
Steven Batki, MD; Daniel Ciccarone, MD, MPH; Scott E. Hadland, MD, MPH; Brian Hurley, MD (Co-Chair); Kimberly Kabernagel, DO; Frances Levin, MD; James McKay, PhD; Larissa Mooney, MD (Co-Chair); Siddarth Puri, MD; Richard Rawson, PhD; Andrew Saxon, MD; Kevin Sevarino, MD, PhD; Kevin Simon, MD; Timothy Wiegand, MD
This resource is for informational purposes only, intended as a quick-reference tool based on the cited source guideline(s), and should not be used as a substitute for the independent professional judgment of healthcare providers. Practice guidelines are unable to account for every individual variation among patients or take the place of clinician judgment, and the ultimate decision concerning the propriety of any course of conduct must be made by healthcare providers after consideration of each individual patient situation. Guideline Central does not endorse any specific guideline(s) or guideline recommendations and has not independently verified the accuracy hereof. Any use of this resource or any other Guideline Central resources is strictly voluntary.
Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.
This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.
The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.