Pelvic Girdle Pain in the Antepartum Population
Publication Date: May 1, 2017
Last Updated: March 14, 2022
Recommendations
Risk Factors
Clinicians should utilize the following risk factors: prior history of pregnancy, orthopedic dysfunctions, increased body mass index (BMI), smoking, as well as work dissatisfaction and a lack of belief of improvement in the prognosis of pelvic girdle pain (PGP). (A)
325320
Postural Changes
Clinicians should not consider postural changes as indicative of the development and/or intensity of PGP in the antepartum population. (B)
325320
Clinical Course
Clinicians should (consider) treat patients with early onset, multiple pain locations, a high number of positive pelvic pain provocation tests (PPPTs), work dissatisfaction, and lack of belief of improvement, as these are strong/moderate factors in determining the potential for persisting PGP in late pregnancy and postpartum. ()
(A/B)
325320
Diagnosis/Classification
Clinicians may consider the utilization of the classification system for the diagnosis of the type of PGP in antepartum population. (B)
325320
Differential Diagnosis
PGP, in this population, should be differentiated from signs and symptoms of serious disease and psychological factors when the symptoms are not associated with the described clinical course of PGP, impairments are failing to normalize, and the symptoms are worsening with increased disability. This should include the presence of transient osteoporosis and diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) as possible comorbidities in this population, as well as the presence of pelvic floor muscle, hip, and lumbar spine dysfunctions. (A)
325320
Imaging Studies
In the absence of good evidence, expert opinion and foundation science may be used to guide examination with the use of imaging studies. (F)
325320
Examination—Outcome Measures
Clinicians should administer self-reported outcome questionnaires such as Disability Rating Index (DRI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). These scales are practical for the determination of baseline disability, function, and pain belief, as well as change throughout the clinical course. These should be utilized in combination with clinical examination for clinical decision. (A)
325320
Examination—Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction Measures
While strong evidence exists to support a high risk of falls, no measures have been validated to objectively assess the dynamic balance and fall risk in antepartum population. (E)
325320
Intervention—Support Belts
Clinicians should consider the application of a support belt in the antepartum population with PGP. The 4 studies reviewed investigated different patient populations and had varied intervention groups and controls, different durations of intervention application, and different timing of follow-up. Further research is needed to clarify initial application, duration, and specific antepartum PGP patient classification for support belt intervention. (D)
325320
Intervention—Exercise
Clinicians should consider the use of exercise in the antepartum population with PGP. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) have recommended exercise for health benefits because of the low risk and minimal adverse effects for the antepartum population. The 2 systematic reviews as well as the recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were nonspecific in the application of exercise to heterogeneous groups of pregnancy low back pain (PLBP) and PGP. The populations varied in early and late pregnancy and demonstrated a variety of exercise interventions. (D)
325320
Intervention—Manual Therapy
Clinicians may or may not utilize manual therapy techniques including high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulations for the treatment of PBLP and PGP. This evidence is emerging and treatment could be considered, as there is little to no reported evidence of adverse effects in the healthy antepartum population. (C)
325320
Recommendation Grading
Disclaimer
Overview
Title
Pelvic Girdle Pain in the Antepartum Population
Authoring Organization
American Physical Therapy Association
Publication Month/Year
May 1, 2017
Last Updated Month/Year
June 9, 2022
Document Type
Guideline
External Publication Status
Published
Country of Publication
US
Target Patient Population
Pregnant women experiencing pelvic girdle pain
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Home health, Hospital, Outpatient
Intended Users
Physical therapist, occupational therapist, nurse midwife, nurse, nurse practitioner, physician, physician assistant
Scope
Counseling, Assessment and screening, Management, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)
D059388 - Pelvic Girdle Pain
Keywords
physical therapy, antepartum, pelvic girdle pain
Source Citation
Clinton, Susan C. PT, DScPT, OCS, WCS, FAAOMPT1; Newell, Alaina PT, DPT, WCS, CLT-LANA2; Downey, Patricia A. PT, PhD, DPT3; Ferreira, Kimberly PT, PhD, MSPT4 Pelvic Girdle Pain in the Antepartum Population: Physical Therapy Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health From the Section on Women's Health and the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association, Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy: May 2017 - Volume 41 - Issue 2 - p 102-125 doi: 10.1097/JWH.0000000000000081