Evaluation Of Individuals With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer? Diagnosis And Management Of Lung Cancer
Publication Date: May 1, 2013
Recommendations
Anatomic Imaging
In the individual with an indeterminate nodule that is visible on chest radiography and/or chest CT, we recommend that prior imaging tests should be reviewed. (1, C)
307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that has been stable for at least 2 years, we suggest that no additional diagnostic evaluation need be performed. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with an indeterminate nodule that is identifi ed by chest radiography, we recommend that CT of the chest should be performed (preferably with thin sections through the nodule) to help characterize the nodule. (1, C)
307795
Solid Nodules Measuring >8 mm in Diameter
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter, we suggest that clinicians estimate the pretest probability of malignancy either qualitatively by using their clinical judgment and/or quantitatively by using a validated model. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter and low to moderate pretest probability of malignancy (5%-65%), we suggest that functional imaging, preferably with PET, should be performed to characterize the nodule. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter and a high pretest probability of malignancy (>65%), we suggest that functional imaging should not be performed to characterize the nodule. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter, we recommend that clinicians discuss the risks and benefits of alternative management strategies and elicit patient preferences for management. (1, C)
307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter, we suggest surveillance with serial CT scans in the following circumstances:
• When the clinical probability of malignancy is very low ( <5%)
• When clinical probability is low (<30% to 40%) and the results of a functional imaging test are negative (ie, the lesion is not hypermetabolic by PET or does not enhance >15 HUs on dynamic contrast CT), resulting in a very-low post-test probability of malignancy
• When needle biopsy is nondiagnostic and the lesion is not hypermetabolic by PET
• When a fully informed patient prefers this nonaggressive management approach.
(2, C)307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter who undergoes surveillance, we suggest that serial CT scans should be performed at 3 to 6, 9 to 12, and 18 to 24 months, using thin sections and noncontrast, low-dose techniques. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that shows clear evidence of malignant growth on serial imaging, we recommend nonsurgical biopsy and/or surgical resection unless specifically contraindicated. (1, C)
307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter, we suggest nonsurgical biopsy in the following circumstances:
• When clinical pretest probability and findings on imaging tests are discordant
• When the probability of malignancy is low to moderate (~10% to 60%)
• When a benign diagnosis requiring specific medical treatment is suspected
• When a fully informed patient desires proof of a malignant diagnosis prior to surgery, especially when the risk of surgical complications is high.
(2, C)307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule that measures >8 mm in diameter, we suggest surgical diagnosis in the following circumstances:
• When the clinical probability of malignancy is high (>65%)
• When the nodule is intensely hypermetabolic by PET or markedly positive by another functional imaging test
• When nonsurgical biopsy is suspicious for malignancy
• When a fully informed patient prefers undergoing a defi nitive diagnostic procedure.
(2, C)307795
In the individual with a solid, indeterminate nodule measuring ≥8 mm in diameter who chooses surgical diagnosis, we recommend thoracoscopy to obtain a diagnostic wedge resection. (1, C)
307795
Solid Nodules Measuring ≤8 mm in Diameter
In the individual with a solid nodule that measures ≤8 mm in diameter and no risk factors for lung cancer, we suggest that the frequency and duration of CT surveillance be chosen according to the size of the nodule:
• Nodules measuring ≤4 mm in diameter need not be followed, but the patient should be informed about the potential benefi ts and harms of this approach.
• Nodules measuring >4 mm to 6 mm should be reevaluated at 12 months without the need for additional follow-up if unchanged.
• Nodules measuring >6 mm to 8 mm should be followed sometime between 6 and 12 months and then again at between 18 and 24 months if unchanged.
(2, C)307795
In the individual with a solid nodule that measures ≤8 mm in diameter who has one or more risk factors for lung cancer, we suggest that the frequency and duration of CT surveillance be chosen according to the size of the nodule:
• Nodules measuring ≤4 mm in diameter should be reevaluated at 12 months without the need for additional follow-up if unchanged.
• Nodules measuring >4 mm to 6 mm should be followed sometime between 6 and 12 months and then again between 18 and 24 months if unchanged.
• Nodules measuring >6 mm to 8 mm should be followed initially sometime between 3 and 6 months, then subsequently between 9 and 12 months, and again at 24 months if unchanged.
(2, C)307795
Subsolid Nodules
In the individual with a nonsolid (pure ground glass) nodule measuring ≤5 mm in diameter, we suggest no further evaluation. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with a nonsolid (pure ground glass) nodule measuring >5 mm in diameter, we suggest annual surveillance with chest CT for at least 3 years. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with a part-solid nodule measuring ≤8 mm in diameter, we suggest CT surveillance at approximately 3, 12, and 24 months, followed by annual CT surveillance for an additional 1 to 3 years. (2, C)
307795
In the individual with a part-solid nodule measuring >8 mm in diameter, we suggest repeat chest CT at 3 months, followed by further evaluation with PET, nonsurgical biopsy, and/or surgical resection for nodules that persist. (2, C)
307795
Individuals With One or More Additional Nodules Detected During Nodule Evaluation
In the individual with a dominant nodule and one or more additional small nodules, we suggest that each nodule be evaluated individually and curative treatment not be denied unless there is histopathological confirmation of metastasis. (2, C)
307795
Title
Evaluation Of Individuals With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer? Diagnosis And Management Of Lung Cancer
Authoring Organization
American College of Chest Physicians
Publication Month/Year
May 1, 2013
External Publication Status
Published
Country of Publication
US
Document Objectives
The objective of this article is to update previous evidence-based recommendations for evaluation and management of individuals with solid pulmonary nodules and to generate new recommendations for those with nonsolid nodules.
Target Patient Population
Patients with pulmonary nodules
Inclusion Criteria
Female, Male, Adolescent, Adult, Older adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Operating and recovery room, Outpatient, Radiology services
Intended Users
Nurse, nurse practitioner, physician, physician assistant
Scope
Assessment and screening, Diagnosis, Management
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)
D008175 - Lung Neoplasms, D055613 - Multiple Pulmonary Nodules, D001706 - Biopsy, D003952 - Diagnostic Imaging
Keywords
lung cancer, imaging, CT imaging, nodules, biopsy
Methodology
Number of Source Documents
183
Literature Search Start Date
October 1, 2011
Literature Search End Date
May 1, 2012