AAOS 2024 Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Clinical Guidelines Summary - Guideline Central
Recommendations
Document Overview

Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons


Publication Date: May 18, 2024

Page Last Updated: May 5, 2026


Interpreting the Strength of Evidence


Document Overview

Document Title
Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Authoring Society

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Document Publication Date
May 18, 2024
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 5, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/carpal-tunnel/cts-cpg_4-25-19.pdf
Source Citation

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. aaos.org/cts2cpg Published 05/18/2024.


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Document Objectives
This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Scope
Assessment and Screening, Counseling, Diagnosis, Prevention, Rehabilitation, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D001172 - Arthritis, Rheumatoid

D001172 - Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords
CTS, Median Nerve Compression, Wrist/hand pain, carpal Tunnel Syndrome, hand parasthesias, hand weakness, numbness, rheumatoid arthritis
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adolescent, Adult, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Hospital, Operating and Recovery Room, Outpatient, Radiology Services
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Occupational Therapist, Physical Therapist, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Supplemental Methodology Resources
Methodology Supplement Technical Review Data Supplement Data Supplement
Number of Source Documents
285
Literature Search Start Date
Tuesday, March 1, 2022
Literature Search End Date
Tuesday, August 1, 2023
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
Yes
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
No
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
Yes
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
Yes
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.