NASS Diagnosis And Treatment Of Low Back Pain Guideline Summary - Guideline Central
Recommendations
Document Overview

Diagnosis And Treatment Of Low Back Pain

North American Spine Society


Publication Date: Jan 1, 2020

Page Last Updated: May 6, 2026


North American Spine Society Grades of Recommendation


Document Overview

Document Title
Diagnosis And Treatment Of Low Back Pain
Authoring Society

North American Spine Society

Document Publication Date
Jan 1, 2020
Page Last Reviewed/Updated
May 6, 2026
Document Type
Guideline
Country of Publication
United States
Full Text Freely Available
Yes
Full Text Guideline
www.spine.org/Portals/0/assets/downloads/ResearchClinicalCare/Guidelines/LowBackPain.pdf
Source Citation

Kreiner DS, Matz P, Bono CM, Cho CH, Easa JE, Ghiselli G, Ghogawala Z, Reitman CA, Resnick DK, Watters WC 3rd, Annaswamy TM, Baisden J, Bartynski WS, Bess S, Brewer RP, Cassidy RC, Cheng DS, Christie SD, Chutkan NB, Cohen BA, Dagenais S, Enix DE, Dougherty P, Golish SR, Gulur P, Hwang SW, Kilincer C, King JA, Lipson AC, Lisi AJ, Meagher RJ, O'Toole JE, Park P, Pekmezci M, Perry DR, Prasad R, Provenzano DA, Radcliff KE, Rahmathulla G, Reinsel TE, Rich RL Jr, Robbins DS, Rosolowski KA, Sembrano JN, Sharma AK, Stout AA, Taleghani CK, Tauzell RA, Trammell T, Vorobeychik Y, Yahiro AM. Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Spine J. 2020 Jul;20(7):998-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 22. Erratum in: Spine J. 2021 Feb 24;: PMID: 32333996.


Document Scope, Criteria, and Use Cases

Scope
Assessment and Screening, Diagnosis, Management, Rehabilitation, Treatment
Diseases/Conditions (MeSH)

D017116 - Low Back Pain

D017116 - Low Back Pain

Keywords
chronic low back pain, low back pain (LBP), pain
Inclusion Criteria
Male, Female, Adult, Older Adult
Health Care Settings
Ambulatory, Hospital
Intended Users
Nurse, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Physician Assistant

Recommendation Development Processes & Methodology

Supplemental Methodology Resources
Technical Review Data Supplement
Number of Source Documents
337
Includes peer/external review process?
Yes
Includes public comment process?
Yes
Methodologist involvement?
Yes
Patient involvement?
No
Includes multi-disciplinary group?
Yes
Includes systematic review?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of evidence?
Yes
Grades quality of strength of recommendation?
Yes
Discloses funding source?
Yes
Discloses conflicts of interest?
Yes
Includes benefits/harms analysis with recommendations?
Yes
You rely on Guideline Central for transparency

Guideline Central and select third party use “cookies” on this website to enhance the user experience.

This technology helps us gather statistical and analytical information to optimize the relevant content for you.

The user also has the option to opt-out which may have an effect on the browsing experience.